By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Reports indicate that the US Justice Department has withheld documents from the Epstein files that contain allegations of Donald Trump sexually abusing a minor. These undisclosed pages reportedly include FBI interview notes detailing a woman’s claim of abuse by Mr. Trump in 1983 when she was approximately 13 years old. Democrats on the House Oversight Committee have stated they can “confirm” the Justice Department appears to have illegally withheld these crucial FBI interviews, calling such actions a “White House cover-up” of potential presidential malfeasance.
Read the original article here
The recent unsealing of documents related to Jeffrey Epstein’s associates has brought forward disturbing allegations, with a specific focus on Donald Trump. These files, while extensive, have raised serious questions about potential redactions and withheld information, particularly concerning accusations of sexual abuse involving a minor. More than fifty pages, reportedly containing FBI interview notes, are conspicuously absent from the released documents.
These missing pages are said to detail interviews with a woman who alleges she was sexually abused by Trump in 1983 when she was just thirteen years old. The nature of these allegations is particularly graphic, with summaries suggesting Trump forced the victim’s head towards his exposed penis, an act she subsequently bit. Following this alleged assault, the woman reportedly told investigators that Trump punched her and kicked her out. The Department of Justice has remained silent, offering no explanation to NPR for why these critical documents were not included in the public release.
The discovery of these missing pages was made through a meticulous examination of the Epstein files archive by NPR, which identified a gap in the document serial numbers, indicating that 53 pages had been inexplicably removed. This omission has fueled suspicions of a deliberate cover-up. Democrats on the House Oversight Committee have stated they can “confirm” that the Department of Justice appears to have illegally withheld FBI interviews with a survivor of abuse, which points towards potential obstruction of justice and a further level of seriousness surrounding the allegations.
For many, the news of these accusations, particularly in light of Trump’s past public statements and previous legal entanglements, is not entirely surprising. His history includes a jury finding him liable for sexual abuse, and he has faced accusations of sexual assault from at least 28 women. Furthermore, public recordings of him boasting about his attraction to his own daughter have added to a broader public perception of his character, leading some to express little astonishment at these new allegations.
The lack of surprise stems from a deep-seated belief held by many that Trump’s behavior has long been an open secret, predating the release of the Epstein files. His infamous “grab ’em by the pussy” comment, widely interpreted as an admission of sexual assault, was seen by many as insufficient evidence for accountability. The current situation suggests that the missing files, and perhaps more damning evidence within them, represent the “why” behind any perceived obstruction or cover-up attempts, a strategy some believe is employed to inundate the public with so many scandals that truly reprehensible acts go unnoticed.
The narrative that Trump is a narcissist who believed he could capitalize on the release of the Epstein files, while simultaneously hiding his own involvement, resonates with some. The idea is that he anticipated getting his way and avoiding consequences, as he often has. However, this strategy is seen as potentially backfiring, as a significant portion of the electorate voted against him, and their ongoing demand for accountability, alongside that of the survivors, is a powerful driving force against him.
The notion that “people with a brain have already known he was a pedophile for over 10 years” is a sentiment echoed by many who feel the Epstein files, while significant, merely confirm what they already suspected or believed based on existing public information. Trump’s adjudication as a rapist and the numerous testimonies of sexual assault against him have, for some, painted a clear picture long before these files came to light. The fact that these allegations only gained traction when the files were removed is seen as a deliberate tactic to obscure the truth.
The “utter shock and surprise” expressed by some is met with sarcasm, as many feel the outcome was predictable given the ongoing efforts for transparency. The accusation of not only sexual abuse but also murder of minors, as mentioned in relation to the Epstein files, elevates the gravity of the situation significantly. The silence from certain political factions, particularly those associated with QAnon and Pizzagate, is noted, with an implication that their interest in child abuse issues is purely political rather than genuine. The label “Pedo in chief” is a stark descriptor used by those who believe Trump’s supporters remain steadfastly loyal despite the mounting accusations.
The fear that no one will be prosecuted as a result of these revelations is a palpable concern for many. The accusations, now surfacing in the Epstein files and corroborated by information outside of them, point to a pattern of behavior that is deeply troubling. The fact that a sitting president, or a former president in this context, could be accused of such heinous crimes and not face immediate legal repercussions is seen as a failure of the justice system.
The specific detail about the victim biting Trump’s penis is highlighted as a moment of defiance. However, the subsequent refusal of the accuser to participate in further investigation related to her claims is noted by some as a complicating factor, though not necessarily diminishing the core allegations. The political divide is starkly illustrated, with some arguing that a significant portion of white voters, particularly men, are more focused on other issues such as LGBTQ+ rights and the treatment of non-white people, and are willing to overlook these accusations due to a commitment to other policy promises.
The idea that Trump attempted to shut down NPR, and that NPR is now instrumental in exposing these allegations, is seen as a poetic justice. The assertion that Trump supporters will not care is a cynical, yet for some, a realistic prediction. The phrase “child rape” is used to directly label the alleged actions, bypassing euphemisms. The suggestion that even the accuser biting Trump’s penis might not be enough to elicit consequences is a grim outlook shared by many. The timing of the story’s wider dissemination by major outlets like the New York Times, after days of initial release, suggests that investigative work was done to verify the claims, lending them more credibility.
Ultimately, the core of the discussion revolves around the repeated accusations against Donald Trump, the potential obstruction of justice through the withholding of key documents from the Epstein files, and the deep concern and frustration over the perceived lack of accountability for such serious allegations, particularly those involving the abuse of minors. The question “What will it take?” hangs heavy in the air for many who believe justice is not being served.