By John Q. Hosedrinker 
During a podcast appearance, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. stated he is not afraid of germs, citing past cocaine use. He detailed continuing in-person recovery meetings during COVID-19, prioritizing his addiction treatment over germ fears, as he views addiction as a more immediate threat. These remarks sparked criticism from political figures who questioned his judgment on public health matters.
Read the original article here
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. recently shared a rather candid anecdote with podcaster Theo Von, admitting to a past habit of using cocaine, specifically stating he used to “snort cocaine off toilet seats.” This revelation, made during an appearance on Von’s “This Past Weekend” podcast, has naturally stirred a considerable amount of discussion and reaction.
The imagery evoked by the statement is undeniably stark and immediately prompts a visceral response. The notion of using a toilet seat as a surface for drug consumption conjures a sense of extreme desperation or a complete disregard for hygiene and conventional norms, painting a vivid picture of a darker period in his life.
This admission, coming from a prominent public figure and a leading candidate for president, naturally invites comparisons to past political controversies surrounding drug use, particularly among those who have been vocal critics of his current political stances. The stark contrast between these past admissions and the current political climate, where such revelations are being made on public platforms, is a significant point of observation for many.
The discussion around RFK Jr.’s past drug use also touches upon broader societal conversations about addiction, recovery, and the lasting impact of substance abuse on individuals, especially those in positions of influence. It raises questions about how such personal histories are perceived and whether they should factor into public judgment of a candidate’s fitness for office.
Moreover, the context of the interview, a relaxed podcast setting with Theo Von, known for his often unfiltered and humorous style, likely contributed to the candid nature of the exchange. It’s the kind of environment where personal histories, even those considered unsavory, might surface more readily than in a formal political debate or interview.
For some, this revelation is not surprising, given prior narratives about his past struggles with addiction. The Frontline special, mentioned in some discussions, is often cited as a source that offered an “eye-opening” look into his history, suggesting that the current admission aligns with a known pattern.
The comment about RFK Jr. being “fucking weeeeeeeiird” encapsulates a sentiment echoed by many, suggesting that his public persona and admissions contribute to a perception of eccentricity that sets him apart from more conventional political figures.
The juxtaposition of this admission with the historical scrutiny faced by other political figures, such as the “not inhaling” marijuana controversy surrounding Bill Clinton, highlights a perceived shift in what is considered politically acceptable or newsworthy regarding personal drug use.
Some reactions lean towards humor, with mentions of Mitch Hedberg jokes and the idea of “addiction transfer,” suggesting that the compulsion for drug use might manifest in other obsessions, such as his current fervent advocacy for certain health and political causes.
The underlying sentiment in much of the commentary revolves around a sense of disbelief or bewilderment that such a personal and potentially damaging detail would be shared so openly by a political candidate. This is amplified by the common experience of individuals with past drug offenses facing significant barriers to employment and societal acceptance.
The phrase “still does but he used to, too” offers a humorous yet pointed take on the immediacy of the past behavior, implying that the line between “used to” and “still does” might be blurrier than explicitly stated.
Ultimately, RFK Jr.’s admission about snorting cocaine off toilet seats is a notable moment in his public discourse, sparking conversations that range from personal judgment to broader societal reflections on addiction, public candor, and the evolving landscape of political disclosure.