By John Q. Hosedrinker 
A Turning Point USA event for Maryland high schoolers was reportedly referred to child protective services due to parental concerns about student safety and transparency. A parent, identified as “Nancy,” expressed worries that excluding adults from the event put children at risk of undue influence during critical developmental stages. The 17-year-old president of the local TPUSA chapter defended the decision to limit adult attendance to parents and volunteers, citing online accusations and clarifying his own minor status and clean record.
Read the original article here
Child Protective Services has reportedly been called into action following concerns voiced by parents regarding a Turning Point USA event held at a high school. The situation arose from a parent’s testimony at a Calvert County school board meeting, where she expressed “serious concern” for the safety of students attending the event. The core of her apprehension stemmed from the fact that adults were initially barred from attending this student-focused gathering.
However, the narrative surrounding adult attendance is somewhat nuanced. The 17-year-old president of the Calvert County Club America, an organization affiliated with Turning Point USA, clarified that some adult presence would indeed be permitted. This limited attendance, restricted to parents and volunteers, was a response to the “hate” the group had encountered online. The young president addressed accusations of grooming and alleged felony charges against a supposed adult leader, asserting his own status as a minor and therefore incapable of grooming children, and denying any criminal record.
Despite these clarifications, the parent who spoke at the school board meeting remained firm in her belief that the event posed a risk. She highlighted that excluding parents from a student-centric event raised significant questions about student safety, parental rights, and oversight. Her argument emphasized the vulnerability of students, particularly during critical developmental stages where they are highly susceptible to external influences. It remains unclear if this specific parent was the one who initiated the report to Child Protective Services.
The involvement of Turning Point USA in high school events comes at a time when the organization has seen a notable increase in young people joining, particularly in the wake of its founder Charlie Kirk’s assassination. Following Kirk’s death, the group reported a substantial surge in college student interest. Turning Point USA’s stated mission is to educate, train, and organize students to champion principles of fiscal responsibility, free markets, and limited government, with a strong emphasis on capitalism as the most moral economic system.
However, the organization has also been a subject of significant criticism, largely due to controversial views espoused by its late founder. Charlie Kirk was known for his strong opposition to the “LGBTQ agenda” and had called for the overturning of convictions for hate crimes related to flag burning. He also made contentious claims about COVID-19 vaccines and the integrity of the 2022 election. The organization is currently led by his widow, Erika Kirk.
The decision to involve Child Protective Services highlights a deep-seated concern among some parents regarding the nature of the content and the potential influence of politically affiliated groups on young minds. The argument has been made that any politically charged group should ideally be kept at a distance from individuals under the age of 18. The notion that a minor cannot groom other children is itself a point of contention, as studies on child sexual abuse indicate that juvenile perpetrators are involved in a significant number of cases.
Furthermore, concerns have been raised about the leadership of Turning Point USA, with accusations of grooming and connections to individuals facing serious allegations. The Southern Poverty Law Center, an organization that tracks hate groups, has classified Turning Point USA as a threat, citing its association with the “hard-right” and allegations of promoting Christian nationalism and right-wing ideologies.
The specific circumstances leading to the CPS report underscore a broader debate about the role of political organizations in educational settings and the extent to which parents should have oversight. The assertion that older children can indeed groom younger ones directly challenges the defense offered by the 17-year-old club president. The situation has brought to the forefront discussions about indoctrination, the protection of vulnerable youth, and the potential for organizations, even those led by young people, to be influenced by adult agendas. The reporting of such events to child protective services signifies a serious escalation of parental concerns about the safety and well-being of students within the school environment.