By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Newly released body camera footage directly contradicts the Trump administration’s narrative that Marimar Martinez, who was shot by Border Patrol agent Charles Exum, was a “domestic terrorist.” The videos, made public after a judge’s ruling, show agents in the Border Patrol SUV discussing aggressive tactics and feeling “boxed in” before Exum intentionally collided with Martinez’s vehicle. Exum subsequently fired five shots at Martinez, a U.S. citizen and teacher’s assistant, who sustained multiple gunshot wounds. This evidence proved crucial in prosecutors dropping charges against Martinez, particularly after Exum was found to have bragged about the shooting in text messages.
Read the original article here
It’s time to get aggressive. That chilling phrase, uttered by a Border Patrol agent shortly before Marimar Martinez was shot five times, paints a disturbing picture, one that the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) initially attempted to frame as a response to a “terrorist.” However, newly released videos are telling a dramatically different story, one that casts serious doubt on the official narrative and highlights a pattern of alleged misconduct within DHS agencies.
The initial portrayal of Marimar Martinez as a threat seems to have been aggressively pushed by the Trump administration. One of the most egregious examples cited involves the release of dashboard camera footage from an unrelated car collision, which was then presented as evidence that Martinez “rammed” an ICE vehicle. The reality, as the footage allegedly shows, is quite the opposite: ICE agents were the ones who initiated the collision, ramming her vehicle. This misrepresentation, many suggest, is indicative of a deeper issue, a descent into what some perceive as fascist government tactics.
Newly released body camera footage is central to this evolving narrative. These videos directly challenge the Trump administration’s efforts to label Marimar Martinez a “domestic terrorist.” The footage, made public after a federal judge ruled it could be released, along with other evidence, casts a starkly different light on the events of that October day. This evidence is not an isolated incident; it’s part of a broader pattern where federal prosecutors have faced challenges in justifying shootings and other instances of excessive force by DHS immigration agents. Time and again, when forced to defend these actions in court, the initial claims appear to unravel.
The implications of these newly released videos are significant, particularly in understanding why federal prosecutors ultimately dropped charges against Martinez. The case against her, which had led to an indictment for allegedly impeding federal agents, began to fall apart once text messages from the involved Border Patrol agent, Charles Exum, surfaced. These messages reveal Exum bragging about the shooting. He allegedly wrote, “5 shots, 7 holes,” in one message, and in another, “Put that in your book boys.” The fact that he wrote, “I’m up for another round of ‘fuck around and find out’” and “My 15 mins of fame. Lmao,” suggests a disturbing level of bravado and a lack of remorse, rather than an act of self-defense or necessary force. It was these texts, among other revelations, that led prosecutors to drop the case against Martinez in November.
The braggadocious nature of Exum’s messages, coupled with the visual evidence, suggests a clear escalation by the agents involved. In one video, agents in the vehicle are heard saying, “It’s time to get aggressive and get the fuck out, because they’re trying to box us in.” Another agent states, “We’re going to make contact, and we’re boxed in.” This is immediately followed by Exum sharply turning the steering wheel, resulting in a collision. Crucially, the shooting occurs within seconds of Exum exiting the vehicle. This sequence of events, as seen through the bodycam footage, suggests that the agents were not acting out of fear for their lives but rather initiating contact with a clear intent to confront, an intent that tragically culminated in extreme violence.
The support Exum allegedly received from his superiors after the shooting is also a point of serious concern. Text messages indicate he felt he had “big time” support from high-ranking officials, including former Border Patrol Commander Gregory Bovino, Border Patrol Chief Michael Banks, and Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem. Some colleagues even congratulated him, calling him a “legend” and offering to buy him beer. This alleged camaraderie and congratulatory atmosphere surrounding a shooting, especially one where the narrative is now so heavily contested by video evidence, raises profound questions about accountability and the culture within these agencies.
The sheer brutality of the shooting, with Martinez reportedly sustaining five shots and seven wounds, is horrific in itself. However, Exum’s detached and even celebratory descriptions of the event, particularly his focus on the number of wounds, are deeply disturbing. The fact that he appears to be boasting about his shooting skills, even detailing exit wounds as some sort of mark of prowess, rather than focusing on the gravity of taking a life, is a stark indicator of a severe lack of empathy and professionalism. It suggests a mindset far removed from the principles of law enforcement and closer to that of a hunter.
This incident, and the evidence surrounding it, has led many to question the very foundation of the Department of Homeland Security and its various agencies, including Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). The suggestion that agents are engaging in a pattern of lying and fabricating narratives to justify excessive force is deeply troubling. The fact that cases are collapsing once subjected to judicial scrutiny points to a systemic issue that requires far more than superficial review. Marimar Martinez is now expected to announce a civil lawsuit, a legal path many believe is necessary to seek justice and hold those responsible accountable for what appears to be a deliberate and excessive use of force, fueled by an aggressive mindset and a willingness to falsify accounts. The situation underscores a critical need for transparency, rigorous oversight, and a fundamental re-evaluation of how these powerful agencies operate.