By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem faces significant public disapproval, with nearly 60% desiring her removal from office, and a growing number of lawmakers supporting her ouster, including 187 House Democrats backing an impeachment resolution. Recent reports have detailed alleged “constant chaos” within the department under her leadership, including instances of senior staff being berated and employees being terminated, such as a U.S. Coast Guard pilot fired after a blanket was misplaced. Further compounding these issues is a report detailing a strained relationship with U.S. Coast Guard officials, exacerbated by a directive to redirect search-and-rescue resources to assist with migrant deportations.
Read the original article here
New allegations are surfacing that cast a shadow over Kristi Noem, adding to an already substantial list of controversies that seem to follow the South Dakota governor. This latest incident involves the U.S. Coast Guard and raises serious questions about her judgment and priorities, particularly concerning the allocation of critical resources during a life-or-death situation.
The core of the new controversy stems from an event last year where a 23-year-old Coast Guardsman went overboard into the Pacific Ocean. Amidst a widespread search and rescue operation involving ships and aircraft, Governor Noem reportedly intervened to divert a Coast Guard C-130 aircraft. This plane, initially tasked with transporting detained migrants, was allegedly pulled from the search for the missing guardsman so it could be used for deportations instead.
This decision is particularly galling given the circumstances. While a Coast Guardsman was lost at sea, requiring all available assets, a high-priority search and rescue mission was seemingly interrupted to facilitate a less time-sensitive immigration task. The urgency of finding a person in the water, especially in a vast ocean, is paramount, and diverting resources away from such an effort for any reason other than imminent threat or futility is deeply concerning.
Further details emerging from this situation suggest a pattern of behavior within Noem’s circle. Reports indicate that she and her top adviser have a history of creating a hostile work environment, including administering polygraph tests to employees they distrust and firing individuals over seemingly minor issues. In one instance, a U.S. Coast Guard pilot was reportedly fired after a blanket belonging to Noem was left behind on a plane.
The alleged firing of a pilot for a misplaced blanket highlights a perceived disconnect between the severity of actions and the resulting consequences, especially when contrasted with the gravity of the Coast Guard incident. It paints a picture of leadership that prioritizes personal convenience or perceived slights over the lives and well-being of service members and the critical missions they undertake.
The timing of Noem’s intervention also raises eyebrows. It occurred shortly after her confirmation to her role, suggesting a potential early demonstration of her command style and decision-making processes. The fact that the C-130 was diverted away from a search where there was still a sliver of hope to locate the missing guardsman, as evidenced by the continued search by other assets, makes the decision even more questionable.
This latest report, when viewed alongside other past criticisms and controversies, contributes to a growing narrative about Kristi Noem’s leadership. From past incidents involving animal welfare to allegations of political maneuvering and a perceived disregard for established protocols, these new Coast Guard allegations add another significant layer to the scrutiny she faces.
The situation also brings into question the actions of those within the Coast Guard who followed the order. While politicians can make decisions, the adherence to what some perceive as an unlawful or deeply questionable order from military personnel is also a point of concern, suggesting a difficult position for service members caught between civilian directives and their professional judgment.
The ultimate outcome for the missing guardsman was tragic, with the individual never being found. This somber reality underscores the immense responsibility that comes with diverting resources from a search and rescue operation. The fact that the search continued with other vessels, but the C-130 was pulled for immigration duties, suggests a prioritization that many find morally reprehensible.
The recurring theme in these allegations is a perceived lack of empathy and a willingness to subordinate critical safety and rescue missions to other political or administrative priorities. Whether it’s leaving behind personal belongings or the lives of service members, the cumulative effect of these stories is creating a significant challenge for Noem’s public image and her standing.
Ultimately, these new allegations regarding the Coast Guard incident are not occurring in a vacuum. They are being added to an existing ledger of controversies, making it increasingly difficult for Governor Noem to escape the narrative that is forming around her leadership. The questions being raised are not just about the specific events, but about the character and judgment of the person in charge.