Representative Nancy Mace has publicly denied allegations of excessive alcohol and marijuana use, which surfaced in a New York Magazine profile citing former staffers. Mace stated on X that she has a lifelong condition called hemochromatosis, which necessitates frequent phlebotomies and makes alcohol consumption detrimental to her health. These claims come as Mace is also undergoing an ethics review by the House Ethics Committee, though the committee has emphasized that an extension of a matter does not indicate wrongdoing.

Read the original article here

Representative Nancy Mace has found herself in the spotlight following a report detailing allegations of excessive alcohol and marijuana use. The story, which surfaced recently, painted a picture of late-night liquor runs and blurred professional lines, attributed to multiple former staffers. Mace, a Republican currently campaigning for governor in South Carolina and facing an ethics review, has pushed back strongly against these claims, framing them as “fake news” and wild takes on her personal life.

Mace herself addressed the allegations directly, sharing that she has a lifelong, genetic condition called hemochromatosis, where her body absorbs too much iron. She explained that this condition requires her to undergo frequent phlebotomies to remove excess iron, and that “any and all alcohol makes it worse.” She emphatically stated, “Nancy Mace isn’t an alcoholic. Nor do I ‘imbibe.'” This explanation, offered as a direct counter to the claims of excessive drinking, highlights a personal health challenge that she asserts directly impacts her relationship with alcohol.

The report, published by New York Magazine, cited unnamed former staffers who described instances of alleged late-night alcohol requests and personal errands. One former staffer was quoted as saying Mace “would definitely do it excessively,” while another claimed that a scheduler received calls as late as 2 a.m. to procure bottles of tequila. These accounts suggest a pattern of behavior that, if true, would raise questions about professional conduct and boundaries. The article also included allegations that Mace asked a staffer to engage with online “hotness rankings” and defend her on Reddit using burner accounts.

In her response, Mace posted a video on X, stating, “The Fake News sure does like to lie. And now people have the very wildest takes about my personal life and alcohol consumption.” Her firm denial and explanation of her hemochromatosis suggest she believes these allegations are a mischaracterization, fueled by fabricated stories or a misunderstanding of her situation. The timing of these claims is notable, as they emerge while Mace is already under scrutiny from the House Ethics Committee, which has extended an ongoing matter originating from a December referral. While the committee has clarified that an extension does not signify a violation, the renewed attention on her personal conduct adds another layer to the ongoing review.

The public reaction to these allegations has been varied, with many expressing skepticism towards Mace’s claims and leaning towards believing the accounts of former staffers. Some commentators pointed out the irony of a politician facing such allegations while simultaneously advocating for stricter drug testing for others, such as SNAP recipients. The discussion also touched upon the broader issue of substance use among public officials, with some suggesting that it’s an underreported phenomenon, especially given the pressures of public life. The notion that some individuals might use substances to cope with the demands of their roles, or even to navigate the political landscape, was a recurring theme.

There has been particular divergence in opinion regarding the marijuana allegations. While some found the claims of excessive alcohol use more believable given the described erratic behavior, others found the idea of Mace using marijuana “excessively” less convincing. The reasoning offered was that if she were regularly smoking weed, she might exhibit a more relaxed demeanor, which some feel is not characteristic of her public persona. This suggests a disconnect between the alleged behavior and the perceived personality of the representative, leading to further doubt for some.

The context of Mace’s political affiliation and alignment with former President Donald Trump also played a role in how the allegations were received. Some reactions implicitly or explicitly linked her behavior to the broader political climate and the perceived hypocrisies within certain political circles. The accusations of hypocrisy were particularly strong, with some suggesting that politicians often preach one thing while practicing another in private.

Further complicating the narrative are specific incidents previously reported, such as a police report detailing Mace’s alleged cursing and insults directed at airport police officers. While not directly related to substance use, this incident, where she reportedly called officers “f\*\*\*\*\*\* idiots” and “f\*\*\*\*\*\* incompetent,” contributes to a perception of volatile behavior that some observers believe could be exacerbated by alcohol. The contrast between her public “back the blue” stance and the reported language used towards law enforcement has been a point of contention for critics.

Ultimately, the core of the situation revolves around a report alleging excessive alcohol and marijuana use by Representative Nancy Mace, and her strong denial, attributing any potential issues to a specific medical condition and dismissing the claims as “fake news.” The differing perspectives on her explanation, coupled with past behavioral reports and the ongoing ethics review, create a complex and highly debated situation surrounding her personal conduct and fitness for public office. The question of who to believe – the former staffers or the politician – remains at the forefront of the public discourse.