By John Q. Hosedrinker 
A review of FBI witness interview records released by the Department of Justice has revealed the apparent absence of over 90 documents. This includes three interviews pertaining to a woman who alleged sexual assault by President Donald Trump, in addition to accusations of abuse by Jeffrey Epstein. These missing documents raise questions from lawmakers about the completeness and legality of the DOJ’s release of Epstein-related files. The DOJ denies deleting any records, stating that all responsive documents were produced and unreleased items were either duplicates, privileged, or part of ongoing investigations.
Read the original article here
It appears that a significant number of FBI records, specifically dozens of witness interviews, are conspicuously absent from the extensive files released by the Department of Justice concerning the Jeffrey Epstein investigation. This revelation, uncovered through a review by CNN, raises serious questions about the completeness and transparency of the document release. The missing records include several interviews related to a woman who not only accused Epstein of abuse dating back to her teenage years but also made allegations of sexual assault against President Donald Trump decades ago.
Digging a bit deeper, an evidence log that was provided to the legal team representing Ghislaine Maxwell, a known associate of Epstein, lists approximately 325 FBI witness interview records. However, in the massive trove of documents made available on the Department of Justice’s website, over 90 of these records, representing more than a quarter of the documented interviews, seem to be nowhere to be found. This discrepancy is particularly concerning given the sensitive nature of the allegations involved.
Among the most striking omissions are the three interviews pertaining to the woman who accused President Trump. Her account details repeated abuse by Epstein starting from when she was just a young teenager, alongside her accusations against the President. The fact that these specific interviews are missing fuels further scrutiny into the thoroughness of the DOJ’s compliance with legal mandates to publish these sensitive files.
A Democratic lawmaker, Representative Robert Garcia, has publicly voiced these concerns, highlighting the missing documents as evidence of the DOJ’s potentially incomplete release. As the ranking Democrat on the House Oversight Committee, he pointed out that a survivor’s serious allegations against the President are involved, yet interviews conducted by the FBI with this survivor appear to be missing, leaving the public without access to them.
The White House, for its part, has consistently denied any wrongdoing by President Trump in connection with Epstein, characterizing the allegations against him as “false and sensationalist.” They have referenced a prior DOJ statement that acknowledged some documents contained untrue and sensationalist claims against President Trump, suggesting a potential explanation for the alleged redactions or omissions, though this doesn’t specifically address missing entire interview records.
It’s important to note that details regarding these missing documents, particularly those related to the Trump accuser, have also been reported by other news outlets and independent journalists, indicating this isn’t an isolated observation but a developing story with multiple sources pointing to the same issue. The presence of such gaps in a highly publicized and sensitive investigation inevitably leads to speculation and concern about what might be intentionally obscured.
The implications of these missing records are far-reaching, touching on issues of accountability, transparency, and the integrity of the justice system. When key interviews, especially those involving accusations against a sitting president, are not made public as part of a mandated release, it erodes public trust and fuels suspicions of a cover-up or selective disclosure. The sheer volume of missing documents—over 90 witness interviews—suggests a systemic issue rather than a simple oversight, prompting questions about the archiving and accessibility protocols within the FBI and the DOJ.
The narrative surrounding these missing files also intersects with broader discussions about the influence of wealth and power, and how it might impact investigations and public disclosures. The fact that the files involve a former president and significant figures in a sex-trafficking investigation only amplifies the public’s desire for complete and unvarnished information. The argument can be made that any doubt cast upon the integrity of this document release, especially concerning potentially damaging information, does a disservice to both the victims and the public’s right to know.
Ultimately, the apparent absence of dozens of FBI records, including crucial interviews related to accusations against President Trump, from the publicly released Epstein files is a deeply troubling development. It calls into question the thoroughness of the Department of Justice’s efforts to comply with legal obligations and maintain transparency. The continued push for answers and the demand for the full disclosure of all relevant documents will undoubtedly persist as this story unfolds.