By John Q. Hosedrinker 
AP News reports that hundreds of demonstrators gathered in Milan on Saturday to protest the deployment of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents for the upcoming Winter Olympics. The protest, which took place in Piazza XXV Aprile, drew participants from various political and social organizations, expressing concerns about the presence of ICE agents. Organizers emphasized that the demonstration was against what they perceived as a growing fascism in the United States, despite the agents’ limited role in the Olympic security. The news of the deployment sparked a strong reaction in Italy, with the mayor of Milan expressing his disapproval, and the Interior Minister being called to testify.
Read the original article here
Demonstrators in Milan protest ICE unit at Winter Olympics. Well, this is a pretty loaded topic, isn’t it? It seems the heart of the matter is about the presence of an ICE unit at the upcoming Winter Olympics in Milan, and how that’s being viewed by some folks. The fundamental question seems to be, what’s ICE doing there in the first place? And more importantly, should they even be there?
Demonstrators in Milan protest ICE unit at Winter Olympics. The anger seems to stem from a distrust of ICE’s purpose and activities. The comparison to the SS, the Nazi regime’s security force, is a really strong accusation. It immediately paints a picture of a group perceived as being involved in mass surveillance, state-sanctioned terrorism, and a general lack of respect for human rights. It’s a loaded comparison, and it reflects the intensity of feelings on the issue.
Demonstrators in Milan protest ICE unit at Winter Olympics. It’s pointed out that ICE, or rather, the Immigration and Customs Enforcement, has no inherent mandate to operate in a foreign country. The feeling is that their presence is unwanted and unwarranted. It would be an interesting turn of events if Italy decided to bar them from entering, or even take action against them.
Demonstrators in Milan protest ICE unit at Winter Olympics. There’s a lot of talk about what ICE actually *does*. There are actually two distinct sides to the organization: Enforcement and Removal Operations (ERO) which focuses on enforcing immigration laws, and Homeland Security Investigations (HSI), which deals with issues like human trafficking, cybercrime, and counterterrorism. It’s important to understand the distinctions because one side might be seen as much more problematic in this scenario.
Demonstrators in Milan protest ICE unit at Winter Olympics. The role of HSI is being presented as the more likely reason for an ICE presence at the Olympics. HSI personnel are commonly used to assist with security at these types of international events, and that’s not necessarily new. The potential problem arises if it’s ERO that’s there, because their duties would definitely be out of their normal purview and mandate.
Demonstrators in Milan protest ICE unit at Winter Olympics. The concerns also extend to the possibility of intimidation. The suggestion is that ICE might be there to discourage American athletes from expressing views that are critical of the current administration. That would be a serious abuse of power, as it would clearly infringe on the athletes’ First Amendment rights. It’s a conspiracy theory, but it underscores a deep distrust.
Demonstrators in Milan protest ICE unit at Winter Olympics. The focus turns to the historical context of ICE. The potential scope creep is the fear, where ICE is starting to perform roles well beyond its traditional boundaries. In the specific context of the Olympics, this could mean an overreach and interference in the host nation’s responsibilities.
Demonstrators in Milan protest ICE unit at Winter Olympics. Some commenters are suggesting that the protesters are somehow supporting the Trump administration. They are being accused of being communists. This accusation seems misplaced, as it is the Trump administration that, according to the available information, is the source of ICE being in Italy as additional security. The fact remains that ICE isn’t typically seen as a security organization and lacks the jurisdiction for operations outside of the US.
Demonstrators in Milan protest ICE unit at Winter Olympics. A key point is the difference between HSI and ERO. It clarifies that, historically, the presence of HSI at the Olympics is nothing new. The real problem arises if it’s ERO, which has a much more narrow mandate.
Demonstrators in Milan protest ICE unit at Winter Olympics. The debate boils down to the question of whether the administration is misusing its power. The sentiment seems to be that regardless of the reasons for ICE’s presence, people should actively speak out against it. Even the athletes, despite the potential risks to their future Olympic opportunities. The overarching theme is a distrust of government overreach and a strong belief in the importance of protecting individual rights.