By John Q. Hosedrinker 
The Dilley detention center is currently experiencing a measles outbreak, according to immigration attorney Eric Lee. This follows public outcry regarding the facility’s treatment of children, with at least two confirmed cases as of the article’s publication. The attorney also described the harsh conditions families endure, including poor food and water quality, and shared details about a child’s near-fatal appendicitis. Concerns are further amplified by the measles’ resurgence in the U.S. and its increased risk in confined settings.
Read the original article here
Measles outbreak reported at ICE’s Dilley family detention facility. This is a genuinely frightening situation, and it’s understandable why people are reacting with such strong emotions. The core issue is the outbreak of a highly contagious and potentially dangerous disease within a detention facility housing vulnerable individuals, often children and families. It brings to mind historical parallels of disease outbreaks within confined and unsanitary environments, evoking a sense of dread and déjà vu.
Measles is extremely contagious, and its impact goes far beyond the immediate symptoms. It’s not just about the initial illness; it’s about the lasting damage to the immune system. Once someone contracts measles, their immune memory is essentially wiped out, leaving them vulnerable to other infections for an extended period. This can lead to complications and, sadly, even death, especially for those already in a weakened state. The fact that this is a preventable disease makes the situation even more disturbing. We have the means to protect people, yet an outbreak is occurring.
The lack of vaccinations and inadequate health protocols, unfortunately, point directly to a failure of those in charge. The suggestion that it’s almost by design is a chilling thought, especially when considering historical precedents. The idea that this is a concentration camp, and the comparison to places like Bergen-Belson where diseases like typhus ran rampant, is not an exaggeration of the potential consequences.
The focus on the US government’s role in this outbreak is understandable. The responsibility falls squarely on the shoulders of the authorities who oversee these facilities. The conditions within the detention center – overcrowding, potentially unsanitary living conditions, and the absence of adequate medical care – create the perfect breeding ground for disease. It is important to emphasize that this is happening and it is not a surprise in these environments.
There is a natural concern that this outbreak will spread beyond the detention facility and affect the surrounding communities. Measles does not respect borders or boundaries; it spreads through airborne transmission and respiratory droplets. This is a very real threat, and it highlights the need for a swift and comprehensive response to contain the outbreak and protect the wider public.
The historical comparisons, while emotionally charged, serve a purpose. They force us to confront the gravity of the situation and the potential for tragic consequences. The mention of the smallpox blankets and historical injustices committed against Native Americans is not an attempt to diminish the current crisis but to provide a warning of past actions, and that it is not a stretch to suggest this could be intentional. It’s a reminder that we must remain vigilant and act to prevent a repeat of history.
The calls for action are also important. Shutting down the facility, sending in qualified medical personnel, and providing proper healthcare are crucial steps. The involvement of organizations like Doctors Without Borders or the International Red Cross, which have experience in dealing with outbreaks in crisis situations, could be invaluable.
The frustration with those who support the policies leading to this outbreak is understandable. The conditions within the detention facility are often unacceptable, and the lack of compassion and empathy is deeply concerning. The reminder of the horrific conditions and its association with historical events is necessary, as is the need to remember that the victims deserve the same basic human rights as everyone else.
The potential for political exploitation of the situation is also a valid concern. The eagerness to deflect blame or minimize the severity of the outbreak is infuriating. The reference to Project 2025 and the broader political landscape reminds us that this situation is not isolated; it is a symptom of a larger issue.
The outbreak also begs the question of how many ICE personnel are vaccinated. The fact that the most vulnerable are in detention and those responsible for their health may be unvaxed presents another layer of concern.
In all, this is a horrific situation and the need for action is urgent and necessary.