By John Q. Hosedrinker 
The Marshall Islands has launched a world-first universal basic income (UBI) scheme, providing citizens with $US800 annually to combat rising living costs and poverty. This initiative, funded by a trust under the Compact of Free Association, aims to act as a financial safety net and curb outward migration. While some question its unconditional nature, the government asserts it offers essential economic security and promotes healthier lifestyles for its citizens. The program also explores cryptocurrency payments to reach remote populations, signifying a significant policy experiment with potential implications for future economic disruptions.
Read the original article here
The Marshall Islands has embarked on a pioneering initiative, launching its first universal basic income (UBI) scheme with the express aim of curbing outward migration from its shores. This bold move comes as the nation grapples with the complex challenges of environmental pressures and the allure of opportunities elsewhere, prompting a search for innovative solutions to retain its population. The concept of a UBI, providing a regular, unconditional cash payment to all citizens, is being explored as a critical tool to ensure economic stability and offer a compelling reason for Marshallese people to remain in their homeland.
This initiative is particularly significant given the historical context of the Marshall Islands. Generations have faced adversity, including the long-lasting impacts of nuclear testing conducted in the region, which has contributed to elevated cancer rates and environmental concerns. These factors, coupled with the inherent limitations of island living such as a relatively small population and geographical isolation, have understandably made some residents seek brighter prospects on larger landmasses. The UBI is seen as a way to directly address some of these underlying issues, providing a financial cushion and a sense of security that might otherwise be sought abroad.
A key consideration in the implementation of this UBI is its reach, especially to citizens residing on remote atolls. Recognizing that many of these communities lack access to traditional banking infrastructure like banks and ATMs, and often contend with unreliable internet service, the Marshallese government is exploring the use of cryptocurrency payments. This technological approach is intended to overcome geographical barriers and ensure that the UBI can effectively reach everyone, regardless of their location. The idea is that by leveraging digital currencies, the payments can bypass the limitations of physical infrastructure and connect even the most isolated citizens to this vital financial support.
The broader discussion around UBI often touches upon the looming specter of widespread automation and artificial intelligence. There’s a prevalent sentiment that as technology advances, it could render a significant portion of the human workforce obsolete, mirroring historical shifts like the decline of horse-drawn transportation with the rise of automobiles. In such a future, the question arises about how individuals would earn a living and participate in the economy if their labor is no longer needed. If companies automate entirely, for example, producing goods and services without human employees, then who would have the money to purchase those very products? This future scenario underscores why a UBI is increasingly viewed not just as a social welfare program, but as a potential necessity for maintaining societal function and preventing widespread destitution.
However, historical perspectives on industrialization and automation offer a counterpoint. While technological advancements have indeed disrupted specific industries and eliminated certain job roles, they have not historically led to a net decrease in overall employment. Instead, new sectors and job categories have emerged, creating new avenues for work and economic participation. The argument is that while automation might change the nature of work, human demand for goods and services, and the ingenuity to meet those demands, will continue to generate employment opportunities. This suggests that while the fear of job displacement is understandable, the transition may not be as catastrophic as some predict.
Nevertheless, the accelerating pace and scope of AI and machine automation present a new paradigm. Unlike previous technological revolutions that primarily automated manual tasks or specific calculations, AI, combined with advanced robotics, has the potential to automate a much broader spectrum of cognitive and physical labor. If AI can perform nearly any job, and robots can execute the physical tasks, then the question of human relevance in the workforce becomes more pointed. The existence of fully automated businesses, like an AI-powered restaurant, serves as a tangible example of this potential shift, raising concerns about the long-term necessity of human labor in an increasingly automated economy.
Furthermore, a critical perspective on the current economic system suggests that the traditional relationship between labor and capital is undergoing a fundamental transformation. If labor becomes obsolete, the existing economic model, which relies on wages earned through labor to fuel consumer demand, may falter. There’s a concern that instead of a UBI bridging this gap, a new economic reality could emerge where those who own the means of production can operate in entirely self-sufficient, parallel economies. If the wealthy can produce everything they need with automated systems, they might have no incentive to engage with the broader consumer market, potentially leading to a disconnect between capital owners and the general populace.
This scenario raises profound questions about the future of capitalism and societal equity. The responsibility for funding a UBI would likely fall on the wealthiest individuals and corporations. However, the question of whether they would willingly bear this burden, especially if they can maintain self-sufficiency through automated production and trade amongst themselves or with other nations, remains a significant challenge. Without a robust consumer base to purchase their goods and services, the profitability of their automated ventures could diminish, but the drive for market share and profit might still lead to a scenario where the needs of the general population are overlooked in favor of serving a select, ultra-wealthy class.
The Marshall Islands’ UBI scheme, therefore, is not just a domestic policy experiment; it resonates with global conversations about the future of work, economic fairness, and the potential impacts of advanced technology. By proactively implementing a UBI, the nation is attempting to secure its future and empower its citizens, demonstrating a commitment to ensuring that progress and prosperity are shared, and that the allure of emigration is offset by the tangible benefits of staying home. The success of this initiative could offer valuable insights and lessons for other nations contemplating similar measures in an increasingly automated and uncertain world.