By John Q. Hosedrinker 
A New York City man has pleaded guilty to fraud after attempting to claim ownership of the New Yorker Hotel. Mickey Barreto used an obscure housing law to live rent-free for years, eventually forging property records to assert ownership of the entire building. His fraudulent efforts included uploading a fake deed to a city website and attempting to collect rent and demand bank transfers. Barreto has been sentenced to a six-month prison term, already served, and five years of probation.
Read the original article here
It’s quite a tale, isn’t it? A man manages to live in the iconic New Yorker Hotel for free, then claims to own the entire building, and finally pleads guilty. It’s the kind of story that sounds ripped from a fictional screenplay, but it actually happened.
The whole saga began, as these things often do, with a seemingly innocuous payment. Our protagonist, let’s call him Barreto, along with his boyfriend, paid a mere $200 back in 2018 for a single night’s stay in one of the New Yorker Hotel’s over 1,000 rooms. But Barreto, it seems, had bigger plans than just a brief visit. He quickly requested a lease, arguing that his one-night tenancy entitled him to the protections afforded by a city housing law designed for single-room occupants in buildings constructed before 1969.
When the hotel understandably pushed back, Barreto took his argument to housing court. The situation took a rather interesting turn when the hotel failed to send legal representation to a crucial hearing. This oversight proved to be a significant misstep, as it resulted in Barreto being awarded “possession” of the room. So, at this point, he had effectively secured himself a place to live, rent-free, thanks to a legal technicality and a hotel’s administrative lapse.
However, Barreto apparently wasn’t content with just having a room. Manhattan prosecutors allege that he then escalated his scheme, engaging in a more audacious act of deception. He is accused of defrauding the state by uploading a fabricated deed to a city website. This fake document, prosecutors claim, falsely purported to transfer ownership of the entire New Yorker Hotel building into his own name. This is where the narrative really goes off the rails, transforming a clever exploitation of a loophole into a full-blown fraud.
The sheer audacity of claiming ownership of such a landmark building is astonishing. And to do so by allegedly forging official documents and submitting them through a city portal? It’s a level of audacity that makes you wonder about the thought process behind it. The New Yorker Hotel itself, a grand Art Deco structure, has a rich history, and the idea of someone attempting to seize it through such means is quite a spectacle.
Adding another layer to this already bizarre story is the current owner of the New Yorker Hotel. It’s owned by the Holy Spirit Association for the Unification of World Christianity, a group often referred to as the “Moonies,” founded by the late Rev. Sun Myung Moon. This detail injects an element of the unexpected into the proceedings, as the hotel’s ownership adds a unique dimension to the legal and criminal ramifications of Barreto’s actions.
It’s really a case of someone having a golden ticket and then choosing to gamble it all away. Barreto managed to exploit a housing loophole that granted him guaranteed accommodation in a prime New York City location, and he couldn’t leave it at that. The impulse to push further, to go from securing housing to attempting to seize the entire property, is a classic example of unchecked ambition or perhaps a profound misunderstanding of consequences. It’s a cautionary tale about the dangers of greed and the importance of knowing when to stop.
The question on many minds, naturally, is how he eventually lost possession of that room he’d secured. The details are a bit hazy on the specifics of how that particular aspect was resolved, but the overarching narrative is that his subsequent actions, specifically the alleged deed fraud, led to his downfall and his guilty plea. It’s like he was winning the game, but then decided to change the rules in a way that was clearly against the spirit, and the letter, of the law.
The entire situation also raises interesting points about our legal system and the potential for loopholes. Some have mused about the necessity of regularly reviewing laws to prevent their gross misuse. The idea of a built-in mechanism to examine statutes for unintended consequences or exploitation every so often is certainly food for thought, especially when scenarios like this unfold.
And then there’s the “how” of uploading a fake deed to a city website. In our digital age, the ease with which information can be disseminated is unparalleled, but so too can the potential for digital deception. The process of recording property records typically involves physical or securely digitized documents at a courthouse or register of deeds office. Injecting a fraudulent deed into such a system would require bypassing significant security measures, making the accusation of defrauding the state all the more serious.
Ultimately, Barreto’s actions, as alleged by prosecutors, seem to stem from a fundamental miscalculation. He may have successfully navigated a complex legal system to gain housing, but then compounded that success with a far more serious criminal endeavor. The guilty plea suggests an acknowledgment of these actions, bringing a close to this chapter of hotel-themed legal drama. It’s a stark reminder that even in the most unconventional of circumstances, the law eventually catches up, especially when it involves attempting to claim ownership of a historic New York City landmark.