By John Q. Hosedrinker 
MAGA-aligned billionaires Larry and David Ellison have emerged victorious in a bidding war for Warner Bros. Discovery, the parent company of CNN. Paramount Skydance’s revised offer of $31 per share was deemed superior to Netflix’s, leading to the conglomerate’s board unanimously affirming the deal. Following the acquisition, CNN is expected to come under the leadership of Bari Weiss, and the Ellisons’ close ties to Donald Trump suggest potential shifts in the network’s direction.
Read the original article here
The news is swirling with the idea that MAGA billionaires are making a significant move to acquire CNN, and the whispers suggest they aim to transform it into a distinctly “Trumpy” news outlet. This development is causing quite a stir, with many feeling it’s a dire omen for the media landscape and the very nature of information dissemination in the country. It feels like a moment where powerful individuals are consolidating their influence, and the consequences could be far-reaching, impacting how millions of Americans receive their news and form their opinions.
The sheer notion of such a takeover evokes comparisons to dystopian visions, with some suggesting we’re inching closer to the realities depicted in works like “1984.” The concern is that this isn’t just about a change in ownership; it’s about a fundamental shift in the narrative, moving from what some consider “casual sanewashing” to a full-blown alternate reality, not unlike what they perceive is already happening with outlets like Fox News. It’s a sentiment that suggests a deep-seated fear of losing access to objective reporting and being subjected to a deliberately skewed perspective.
This potential acquisition is seen by some as a significant victory for those aligned with the MAGA movement, a group they feel is already achieving much of what they desire. The idea is that Trump’s agenda is being furthered through these media acquisitions, similar to how other major networks are perceived to be falling under MAGA control. It’s a perspective that views these moves as a strategic consolidation of power, aiming to shape public discourse in a specific direction.
The implications for current CNN personnel are also a point of discussion, with speculation that some prominent figures might be on their way out. The suggestion is that the new ownership would inevitably seek to replace established voices with those who align more closely with the desired ideological viewpoint. This would mark a significant departure from the network’s current identity and could alienate long-time viewers.
There’s a palpable sense of dread about the state of big media, with this development being viewed as an exacerbation of already existing problems. The feeling is that the media landscape was already in a precarious position, and this acquisition only pushes it further into what many consider an undesirable direction. It’s a sentiment that suggests a widespread dissatisfaction with the current media ecosystem and a fear that things are only getting worse.
The prospect of “Have you thanked a billionaire and Trump today?” segments airing on CNN paints a stark picture for those concerned about media bias. It’s a satirical jab at what they anticipate will be a relentless barrage of pro-MAGA messaging, integrated into the news programming. This vision highlights the fear of news being replaced by propaganda, where loyalty and ideology trump factual reporting.
Some observers are pointing to the current era as the most corrupt in the nation’s history, with these alleged media consolidations happening “right out in the open.” This brazenness, they argue, is particularly disturbing. There’s a hope expressed that legal avenues, like intervention from the California Attorney General, might be explored to challenge such a monopolistic trend, reflecting a desire for checks and balances against the concentration of media power.
The discussion also touches upon the broader trend of media consolidation, with CNN being the latest target in what some see as a deliberate effort to control the narrative. The idea that “once they own 100% of the narrative the facts won’t matter” encapsulates a core fear that objective truth will be sacrificed in favor of a predetermined agenda. This paints a grim picture of a future where information is not a tool for enlightenment but a weapon for control.
There’s a sense of resignation for some, who feel that this trend is an unstoppable force. The concern is that with the increasing control of media outlets, coupled with other perceived wins for the current administration, the nation is heading down a dangerous path. The statistics on people leaving the US are brought up as a further indicator that things are not going well, adding a layer of national decline to the discussion of media control.
Interestingly, some comments suggest that CNN has already been leaning in a conservative or “Trumpy” direction for some time, implying that this acquisition might be a formalization of an existing trend rather than a sudden shift. The idea is that the network’s “beef” with certain political figures has always been manufactured, and the underlying editorial direction has been more aligned with conservative viewpoints than many realized.
The consolidation of media ownership by a few powerful individuals, particularly those with MAGA affiliations, is seen as a deeply concerning trend. The argument is made that this level of media control by billionaires should be scrutinized under antitrust laws, as it poses a threat to a free and diverse press. The fear is that such monopolies can dictate not only what news we see but also how we perceive the world.
A strong sentiment of boycotting these outlets is prevalent among those who are disillusioned. The idea is to rely on independent media sources and to actively seek out information from multiple perspectives to avoid being swayed by a single, potentially biased narrative. This reflects a desire for personal agency in the face of perceived media manipulation.
The potential for such acquisitions to influence public opinion is viewed as a serious threat to democratic principles. The “firehose of falsehood” strategy, where misinformation is flooded to confuse people, is a key concern. The quote from Timothy Snyder, “To abandon facts is to abandon freedom,” resonates deeply, highlighting the link between objective reporting and the preservation of liberty.
The fear is that this trend represents the end of free speech, not through overt censorship, but through the subtle manipulation of information by powerful media owners. The call to support public broadcasting like NPR and PBS emerges as a potential countermeasure, suggesting a need for alternative sources of news that are not beholden to billionaire interests.
Ultimately, there’s a profound sense of alarm about the concentration of media power in the hands of MAGA billionaires. The concern is not just about CNN, but about a broader trend where a significant portion of the media landscape could be controlled by a few individuals with specific political agendas. This, many believe, poses a fundamental threat to informed public discourse and the health of democracy itself.