The article highlights the recent unsealing of names linked to Jeffrey Epstein, including former Victoria’s Secret CEO Les Wexner, who was labeled a “co-conspirator” by the FBI. Also identified is Sultan Ahmed bin Sulayem, recipient of an email from Epstein expressing pleasure at a torture video, and others such as Salvatore Nuara, Nicola Caputo, Zurab Mikeladze, and Leonic Leonov. This revelation raises questions about the FBI’s prior claims of no knowledge of other sex traffickers within the Epstein files, suggesting a potential cover-up of numerous individuals.

Read the original article here

Representative Ro Khanna has brought a significant development to light concerning the Jeffrey Epstein files, taking the unusual step of reading out the names of six previously redacted individuals on the House floor. This action stems from a visit Khanna, along with Congressman Thomas Massie, made to the Department of Justice to review the unredacted Epstein files. They discovered that a substantial portion, around 70 to 80 percent, of these documents remained heavily redacted. What particularly caught their attention were six names that the Department of Justice had, for reasons that remain unclear, kept hidden.

Upon raising this issue with the DOJ, Khanna and Massie were reportedly told that their oversight was a mistake, and as a result, the identities of these six men have now been revealed. The names shared by Representative Khanna are Salvatore Nuara, Zurab Mikeladze, Leonic Leonov, Nicola Caputo, Sultan Ahmed bin Sulayem, the CEO of Dubai Ports World, and billionaire businessman Leslie Wexner, who was identified by the FBI as a “co-conspirator.” Khanna questioned the necessity of his and Massie’s intervention to obtain this information, suggesting that if they found six hidden names in just two hours of review, many more individuals might be intentionally concealed within the millions of documents.

The revelation about Leslie Wexner is particularly notable, as he was identified as a potential co-conspirator in a 2019 FBI document. This stands in stark contrast to claims made by FBI Director Kash Patel, who, under oath, stated that the agency had no knowledge of any other sex traffickers within the Epstein files. The inclusion of Sultan Ahmed bin Sulayem is also significant; he was reportedly the recipient of an email from Epstein in which the sender expressed enjoyment of a “torture video,” a detail that was initially suppressed.

The public’s attention is now drawn to Salvatore Nuara, about whom relatively little public information is readily available. Reports suggest he was a detective with the New York Police Department and had been investigated in connection with an escort service, though this investigation was not directly tied to Epstein. The fact that he was among the six individuals whose names were initially concealed raises further questions about the extent of the DOJ’s redaction practices and the potential motivations behind them.

Another name that has surfaced is Sultan Ahmed bin Sulayem, identified as the CEO of DP World, a global logistics company. His reported connection to the “torture video” email further fuels the public’s desire for transparency and accountability regarding the Epstein scandal. The inclusion of these names, particularly those from international business and law enforcement backgrounds, suggests a wider network of influential individuals connected to Epstein than previously acknowledged.

The unveiling of these six names has also reignited discussions about the broader scope of the Epstein investigation and the possibility of many more powerful figures remaining in the shadows. Some have pointed out the discrepancy between the limited number of names released and the sheer volume of documents available, suggesting that the “mistake” by the DOJ might have been more deliberate than admitted. The implication is that if six names can be uncovered with such relative ease, the number of people potentially being protected could be significantly higher.

The act of Representative Khanna reading these names on the House floor serves as a powerful symbolic gesture, bringing these individuals out of anonymity and placing them under public scrutiny. It amplifies the calls for a thorough and uncompromised investigation into the Epstein network, pushing back against any perceived attempts to obscure or downplay the involvement of powerful individuals. The focus now shifts to whether these revelations will lead to further investigations and potential consequences for those named, as well as for those who may have been involved in the redaction process itself. The demand for full transparency and accountability is louder than ever, urging a closer look at the millions of remaining unredacted documents.