By John Q. Hosedrinker 
To address increasing bedspace needs and expedite detention and removal, ICE is developing a plan that includes acquiring and renovating eight large-scale detention centers and sixteen processing sites, alongside ten existing facilities. These “mega-centers” are designed to hold 7,000 to 10,000 detainees for an average of less than 60 days, facilitating international removals. This initiative contrasts with current facilities, such as Camp East Montana, which has already faced numerous federal code violations for failing to provide basic necessities and health screenings.
Read the original article here
It appears there’s a growing concern about Immigration and Customs Enforcement, or ICE, making moves to construct massive detention facilities, often being referred to as “mega jails.” This development has sparked significant discussion and apprehension, raising questions about the true purpose and potential future use of these facilities. The sheer scale of the proposed infrastructure suggests a long-term strategy, moving beyond the immediate goal of deporting individuals.
A striking point raised is the immense cost associated with these facilities. With projections of billions of dollars allocated to creating tens of thousands of “beds,” the per-detainee cost is staggering, leading many to question if this is the most prudent allocation of taxpayer money, especially when compared to pressing domestic needs like healthcare, education, and housing.
Many are drawing stark comparisons between these proposed “mega jails” and historical atrocities, specifically referring to them as “concentration camps.” The argument is that these facilities are not intended for individuals already processed through the criminal justice system, but rather for the broader detention of people deemed undesirable or who express dissent. The distinction between jails, which are for those awaiting trial or convicted, and these new facilities, which seem designed for mass detainment, is crucial to this interpretation.
This concern isn’t entirely new; historical government plans, like Operation REX 84 from the Reagan era, are being brought up as evidence of a recurring strategy to round up and detain large populations, including protestors and dissenters. The idea is that these “mega jails” could serve a similar purpose in the present day, a continuation of plans that were once dismissed as conspiracy theories.
There’s a strong call for transparency and accuracy in reporting, with many urging the media to use the term “concentration camps” directly, rather than softer euphemisms. The implication is that the media’s reluctance to label these facilities as such contributes to a sanitization of the issue, masking the gravity of the situation.
Furthermore, allegations have surfaced regarding potential conflicts of interest and profiteering, with certain organizations and individuals allegedly benefiting financially from the construction and operation of these detention centers. The channeling of public funds into private hands for what are perceived as oppressive purposes is a significant point of contention.
The timing of these building projects is also seen as indicative of a broader, more enduring agenda for ICE. The logistics of mass deportations, especially those involving individuals who may have legal protections or are considered political prisoners, are complex. The argument is that these “mega jails” offer a more controlled and discreet solution for holding such individuals within the continental United States, rather than attempting to move them across borders.
The fundamental question being asked is why such extensive infrastructure is needed if the sole objective is deportation. This leads to the unsettling conclusion that these facilities might be intended for a broader population than just immigrants facing removal proceedings. The potential for these facilities to be used against citizens who express opposition to the current administration, or who are deemed to be in violation of various broad societal expectations, is a deeply concerning prospect for many.
The current socio-political climate is being likened to historical periods preceding widespread repression. The fear is that these “mega jails” are not just for immigrants, but could become a tool for silencing dissent, punishing political opposition, or even as a means for real estate manipulation. The prospect of individuals facing detention for activities as mundane as social media posts or perceived acts of defiance is a chilling extrapolation of current trends.
This potential shift in the purpose of detention facilities raises profound questions about due process and civil liberties. If ICE is indeed building these massive structures, and if their operation is not strictly tied to established legal processes for immigration enforcement, then the implications for all Americans are significant. The current prioritization of building these facilities over addressing basic societal needs like affordable housing and healthcare further fuels the anxiety and the perception that the country is heading in a dangerous direction. The urgency to “defund ICE” reflects a deep-seated opposition to the agency’s current trajectory and the construction of these large-scale detention centers.