By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Invoices from Jeffrey Epstein’s FedEx account, recently accessed by The Ditch, indicate the account was used for shipping long after his 2019 death, with activity recorded as recently as summer 2024. These shipments originated from Gulfstream’s product support center in Savannah, Georgia, and were sent to entities including Plan D LLC, the now-dissolved firm that operated Epstein’s private jet, which Donald Trump used during the 2024 presidential campaign. FedEx has since deleted these specific invoices from Epstein’s account.
Read the original article here
It appears that FedEx has taken the step of deleting records associated with Jeffrey Epstein’s account. This development surfaced following a revelation that access to this very account was obtained after the US Department of Justice inadvertently published an unredacted password, which was later removed from Epstein’s files. The timing of this deletion is particularly striking, especially considering recent news that Epstein’s former private jet company, a company that former President Trump has utilized during his 2024 presidential campaign, was still receiving FedEx shipments as recently as 2024. The subsequent disappearance of these invoices has understandably raised eyebrows and fueled a torrent of speculation.
The narrative that FedEx might have “destroyed evidence” is a potent one, especially when viewed through the lens of the ongoing scrutiny surrounding Epstein’s activities. In any common understanding, the records pertaining to Epstein, given his conviction and the extensive nature of the allegations against him, would be considered potential evidence in a multitude of ongoing investigations and inquiries. The notion that these records could simply vanish, particularly when a news outlet, The Ditch, claims to still have access to Epstein’s FedEx account and address book containing numerous names and addresses, including those of individuals connected to prominent figures like Alan Dershowitz, only amplifies the sense of unease.
The speed at which these digital receipts seem to have disappeared, faster than actual packages sometimes do, has led many to question the motives behind the deletions. While the assertion is made that “nothing is ever truly deleted” in the digital realm, and that a digital imprint is traceable, the practical reality of records vanishing from a company’s active systems presents a significant hurdle. This has led to widespread speculation about obstruction of justice, with many wondering who might have instructed FedEx to purge these particular records. The sheer volume of information and the ongoing nature of the Epstein saga suggest that a significant amount of data would have been generated and stored over time.
The situation begs the question of standard business practices regarding record retention. Many companies, especially those handling sensitive information or operating in sectors that could be subject to regulatory oversight, typically maintain extensive backup systems and adhere to strict data retention policies, often for many years, if not a decade or more. The argument is that if a company like Ring can purportedly restore video footage from an account that wasn’t even a subscription account, then a large logistics company like FedEx should theoretically be able to retrieve records from backups, especially for an account that was actively in use. The contrast between this expectation and the reported deletion of Epstein’s records is stark and raises concerns about potential incompetence or, more troublingly, intentional concealment.
The broader context of the Epstein case involves a deeply disturbing network of individuals and allegations of widespread cover-ups for wealthy and powerful figures. The idea that a major corporation like FedEx would engage in actions that could be interpreted as facilitating such a cover-up, by deleting potentially crucial evidence, is deeply unsettling. The suspicion is that “everything happening around Epstein is rotten,” and the actions of FedEx are being seen as another piece of evidence supporting this view. Some have even gone so far as to suggest that the method of transporting victims to Epstein’s infamous island might have involved logistics like those provided by FedEx, which, if true, would cast an even darker shadow over the company’s involvement.
The comparison is also drawn to the idea of a company that can be highly unreliable with customer packages sometimes being remarkably efficient at deleting records. This disparity in service, coupled with the sensitive nature of the deleted data, has intensified the scrutiny. The argument is made that if a company will not delete personal data when an individual closes their account, it becomes even more questionable why they would delete records linked to a high-profile, ongoing legal and ethical scandal. The concern is that this deletion suggests “obstruction of justice” and points to a deeper, more entrenched problem that extends beyond a single account.
The speculation about who instructed FedEx to delete the records is rampant. Some have pointed to connections between FedEx’s CEO and individuals associated with the Trump administration, raising questions about potential political influence or directives. The idea that in a “normal world” federal law enforcement would be investigating FedEx for such actions highlights the perceived extraordinary nature of this event. The call to action from some corners of the internet is to boycott FedEx, to “fight with your money,” and to investigate the company’s leadership and shareholders, suggesting a belief that collusion with the “pedo ring” is a plausible explanation for these actions.
Ultimately, the disappearance of Jeffrey Epstein’s FedEx account records, especially in the wake of a password leak and ongoing investigations, has fueled a firestorm of suspicion and anger. The perceived destruction of potential evidence by a major corporation raises profound questions about accountability, corporate ethics, and the extent to which powerful individuals and their networks can operate with impunity. The hope for many is that “the lid can’t be kept on this thing much longer,” and that sufficient evidence will eventually come to light to expose the full truth, irrespective of whether records are deleted or attempts are made to bury the facts.