By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Estonia’s Foreign Minister Margus Tsahkna has warned that Russia, under Vladimir Putin, is preparing to deploy hundreds of thousands of former soldiers to Europe following a potential ceasefire in Ukraine, aiming to destabilize the continent through hybrid warfare. To counter this imminent security risk, Tsahkna has proposed a blanket ban on Russian soldiers who fought in Ukraine from entering the European Union’s Schengen free-travel zone, a proposal extended to the UK for enhanced collaboration. This initiative stems from concerns that these combatants, including former prisoners and individuals with histories of violence, will be weaponized by Russia for malicious purposes against European societies.
Read the original article here
The notion of Russia potentially unleashing a wave of criminals across Europe, as suggested by Estonia’s foreign minister, paints a truly unsettling picture of future geopolitical challenges. This isn’t just a hypothetical threat; it’s presented as a deliberate strategy, a form of hybrid warfare designed to destabilize the European continent. The core of this concern lies in the idea that following the conflict in Ukraine, Russia might actively facilitate the movement of a significant number of individuals with criminal backgrounds, including ex-prisoners and those convicted of violent offenses, into the Schengen free-travel zone.
The proposed response to this potential influx is rather stark: a comprehensive ban on Russian soldiers who have fought in Ukraine from entering the EU’s open-border area. This move is seen as a necessary countermeasure, a way to proactively defend against what is perceived as an imminent threat. The reasoning behind such a strong stance is rooted in the belief that these individuals are unlikely to seek a quiet life and integration; rather, they are expected to arrive with malicious intent, aiming to disrupt and sow chaos within European societies.
The scale of the potential problem is emphasized by the sheer number of individuals currently engaged in combat roles within Russia. Estimates suggest this figure could be close to a million. The concern is that once the active conflict subsides, or even during periods of relative quiet, these battle-hardened individuals could begin to arrive in Europe in the hundreds of thousands. Their intentions, according to this viewpoint, are far from benign, moving beyond the realm of simply seeking employment and contributing to the economy.
Indeed, the assertion is that these individuals will bring “real bad plans” with them, and that Russia’s special agencies are already actively orchestrating various attacks across Europe. This suggests a coordinated effort to exploit existing vulnerabilities and create a climate of insecurity. The argument is made that this is not a new tactic; Russia has, in the past, been accused of employing a range of methods to undermine its adversaries, and this proposed action is seen as a logical, albeit alarming, extension of that policy.
The urgency of the situation is underscored by the call for a significant shift in European policy, advocating for a complete closure of borders to Russian nationals, with exceptions only for those seeking genuine political asylum. This perspective argues that Europe has been too trusting and naive in its approach, and that it must now prepare for the worst-case scenario, fortifying itself both physically and strategically. The idea of simply waiting for a “peace” that Putin might leverage for his own ends is considered exceptionally shortsighted.
The concern extends to the notion that Russia might be using its own citizens as tools in a broader geopolitical game, and that this is not limited to military personnel. There’s a sentiment that Europe needs to adopt a more assertive stance, moving beyond mere rhetoric and taking decisive action. The potential consequences of inaction are painted as dire, leading to a Europe that is ultimately overwhelmed and unable to maintain its security and stability.
The suggestion that Russia might be leveraging the current global landscape to its advantage, by potentially sending individuals with questionable intentions, raises questions about how such a threat could be effectively managed. The very idea of thousands of battle-hardened individuals with a potential predisposition towards violence entering European societies is a stark reminder of the complex security challenges that lie ahead. The perceived need for Europe to “grow some” and take a more robust approach to its own defense is a recurring theme in these discussions.
There is also a prevailing sentiment that this proposed action by Russia is not entirely surprising, given its past behavior. The parallels drawn to previous actions and accusations suggest a pattern of behavior that Europe would be wise to acknowledge and prepare for. The potential for these individuals to be deployed under various guises or with falsified documentation also presents a significant challenge to border control and intelligence agencies.
Ultimately, the core message being conveyed is one of profound concern regarding Russia’s intentions and the potential ramifications for European security. The proposed blanket ban on Russian soldiers entering the Schengen zone is presented as a defensive measure, born out of a belief that proactive steps are essential to prevent future chaos and instability on the continent. It’s a call for vigilance, a stark warning that the specter of hybrid warfare, involving the instrumentalization of individuals with criminal backgrounds, is a real and present danger that Europe must confront head-on. The efficacy of such a ban, however, and the practicalities of its implementation, remain significant questions that will need to be addressed as these concerns continue to evolve.