By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Deputy US Attorney General Todd Blanche stated that the prosecutors’ review of the Epstein-Maxwell case is concluded. Blanche acknowledged that victims seek justice but maintained that the department will not create evidence. These comments came in response to demands for further accountability from survivors and complaints of incomplete document releases from Democratic lawmakers. Despite addressing some redaction errors, Blanche maintained transparency and emphasized that the justice department has nothing to hide. Democratic figures like Ro Khanna and Jamie Raskin, however, disputed the completeness of the released documents, calling for full transparency and accountability.
Read the original article here
Todd Blanche says review of Jeffrey Epstein sex-trafficking case ‘is over,’ which is… well, let’s just say it’s not exactly inspiring confidence. From what I gather, he’s basically declaring the investigation finished. The implication is, the legal system has done its due diligence, looked over the evidence, and reached a conclusion. The DOJ echoing this sentiment, seemingly satisfied with its work, is a major problem, as it does not appear they did any meaningful investigation.
In essence, the response from many is a resounding “But you haven’t done anything!” The idea that the review is “over” when the core questions haven’t been adequately addressed is… frankly, insulting. It’s like announcing the end of a movie just as the hero is about to face the villain. The very notion that this complex case, involving powerful individuals, potential crimes against children, and alleged cover-ups, can be neatly wrapped up is beyond belief. This review’s conclusion does not inspire any sense of justice or closure.
It seems the sentiment is, “It’s over when *we* say it’s over.” There’s a deep-seated distrust of the institutions involved, especially when considering the lack of substantial action. We’re left with the sense that nothing will really happen and that those responsible will go unpunished. The suggestion that it’s just the beginning of holding these people accountable, and that any attempt to shut down investigations is merely a cover-up.
The idea that Trump’s former lawyer, Blanche, is somehow acting on behalf of an administration that seems to be protecting pedophiles is horrifying. The very existence of redacted files and the lack of full transparency contribute to this feeling of a massive cover-up. It’s pointed out that there’s a lot of disturbing evidence, including photos, but this isn’t enough to prosecute? ICE raids homes without warrants for far less.
There is a sense of outrage that those responsible for such heinous crimes might escape justice while others face harsh consequences for far less serious offenses. If it is done then let us see everything. Everything. The full, unredacted files, with a clear explanation of all redactions. The demand for complete transparency underscores the deep distrust in the system’s ability to deliver justice.
This is a case of how can only one person go down for an entire sex trafficking ring? The focus should be on exposing the people involved. It is an indictment of the system to pretend that this is over. It’s a call for accountability, for the truth to be revealed, and for the victims to finally find justice. This is not over.
There’s a suggestion that perhaps a foreign entity might have a greater interest in holding these people accountable than the U.S. government. A new administration needs to be brought in and all those complacent in the cover-up need to be held accountable, including, of course, the former president. The DOJ is viewed as a political tool of the very people who should be held accountable. And it needs to be bipartisan, but sadly that’s probably not going to happen.