By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Nemesio Rubén Oseguera Cervantes, known as “El Mencho” and the leader of Mexico’s Jalisco New Generation Cartel (CJNG), has reportedly been killed by the Mexican military. This significant development marks the end of a reign by one of the most powerful and violent drug lords in the world. El Mencho’s demise, if confirmed, represents a major blow to the CJNG’s operations and influence within the international drug trade.
Read the original article here
The news is spreading like wildfire: Nemesio Ruben Oseguera Cervantes, better known as “El Mencho,” the notorious leader of Mexico’s Jalisco New Generation Cartel (CJNG), has reportedly been killed by the Mexican Army. This is a seismic event, the kind that sends shockwaves through a nation and beyond. For years, El Mencho and his cartel have been at the forefront of organized crime in Mexico, wielding immense power and causing untold suffering. The idea that he is no longer a threat, that this particular head of the hydra has been severed, is a notion that sparks a complex mix of relief and deep-seated concern.
Indeed, there’s a significant “good” to this news. Many would argue that El Mencho, given the scale of violence and destruction attributed to him and his organization, did not deserve to continue operating freely. His alleged demise represents a potential turning point, a moment where the long arm of the law, or at least the military, has finally caught up to a figure who seemed untouchable. The sheer audacity of his cartel’s operations, their reach, and their brutality have long been a source of fear and instability.
However, the “bad” news is almost as immediate as the good. The unfortunate reality of cartel structures is their insidious ability to adapt and regenerate. The moment one leader falls, another is often waiting in the wings, ready to step into the void. This is the grim prediction, that as El Mencho is removed, another figure is already being positioned to assume control of the CJNG, ensuring the cartel’s continued operation, albeit perhaps with a new face at the helm.
This brings us to the truly “ugly” aspect of the situation: the inevitable unrest and violence that often follows such a high-profile neutralization. Reports are already surfacing of burned cars on the streets of major cities like Puerto Vallarta and Guadalajara, clear indicators that the cartel is not taking this news lying down. This armed chaos, erupting in Jalisco and potentially other regions, is a direct consequence of eliminating such a powerful figure. It’s a stark reminder that the fight against these organizations is far from over, and the immediate aftermath can be incredibly dangerous.
For those caught in the crossfire, the situation is terrifying. Individuals attempting to travel are finding their plans disrupted, with major transportation hubs like the Guadalajara airport facing shutdowns or flight diversions due to the escalating insecurity. The ability to move freely, to reach loved ones, is curtailed, leaving people stranded and anxious. There’s a palpable sense of fear gripping communities, with reports of businesses being targeted in retaliation, adding another layer of terror to the unfolding events.
The scale of this event is immense. El Mencho was the head of one of, if not the biggest, cartel in Mexico. The fact that the government may have not only apprehended him but also significant figures within his organization is being described as a monumental development. It speaks to a potential shift in strategy or execution, a decisive move that could have far-reaching consequences.
The immediate concern for many is the cartel’s response. Retaliation is almost guaranteed. There are already disturbing rumors circulating about potential attacks on civilians, a chilling tactic that has been employed before. The fear in Jalisco is palpable, a testament to the cartel’s reach and their willingness to inflict suffering on innocent populations to assert their power.
For years, there’s been a sentiment that Mexico possesses the capability to dismantle these cartels, provided there is sufficient political will. The argument has often been that the Mexican military, with its superior numbers and strength, could prevail if fully committed. The question remains whether this operation signifies a genuine and sustained commitment to tackling the cartel problem at its core, or if it is a reactive measure with predictable, violent repercussions.
A common refrain in discussions about combating cartels is the importance of decapitation. The idea is to eliminate the leaders, then the lieutenants, and the soldiers who attempt to retaliate. The ultimate goal, as some see it, is to make them unprofitable. The reasoning is that their willingness to kill stems from the profitability of their illicit business. By cutting off their revenue streams and their ability to maintain their operations, their recruitment and their power should theoretically diminish.
The personal accounts of the unfolding chaos paint a vivid picture. Pictures of smoke and burning cars emerging from areas like Puerto Vallarta highlight the immediate and tangible impact of this development. The scenes of convenience stores and pharmacies being torched in retaliation underscore the widespread nature of the cartel’s anger and their desire to sow disruption. It’s a stark reminder of the destructive power these organizations wield and their capacity to inflict damage on a broad scale.
This situation is being likened to other major cartel confrontations, suggesting a pattern of intense conflict in response to government actions. The news about flights being diverted and tourists being under lockdown at Puerto Vallarta airport illustrates the severity of the current unrest. It’s a precarious moment, one that could be viewed as either a triumph for Mexico in its fight against organized crime or a descent into even greater chaos. The fear is that the situation is rapidly deteriorating, with reports of battles, shootings, and roadblocks emerging from multiple states.
There’s a prevalent theory that El Mencho’s apprehension, and subsequent reported death, might have been influenced by external pressures. Some speculate that the timing coincides with increased scrutiny from the United States regarding Mexico’s cartel problem, suggesting a potential political motivation behind the operation.
The notion that the Mexican army could be compromised or even complicit with cartels is a dark undercurrent that often surfaces in these discussions, adding a layer of cynicism and distrust to the official narratives. This doubt, while unproven, reflects a deep-seated concern about corruption within institutions.
Ultimately, the hope is that this event, however chaotic its immediate aftermath, represents a genuine step towards dismantling the cartel infrastructure. The wish for El Mencho’s eternal suffering is a sentiment born out of the pain and loss he is believed to have caused. The core issue remains: these cartels are a cancer, and their removal, while complex and fraught with danger, is a necessity for the well-being of the nation.
The situation in Guadalajara is described as a “shitstorm,” with residents confined to their homes. This illustrates the immediate paralysis and fear that grips communities when such events unfold. The analogy of the hydra, where cutting off one head results in multiple new ones emerging, is a potent one, highlighting the complex, deeply rooted nature of the cartel problem. It’s not simply a matter of removing a single leader; it’s about addressing the systemic issues that allow these organizations to thrive.
The “narcocultura” phenomenon, where drug-related lifestyles are romanticized or normalized, is a significant contributing factor. This cultural aspect, particularly among younger generations, provides a fertile ground for recruitment and perpetuates the cycle of violence. Addressing this cultural dimension through education, alongside efforts to reduce drug demand in consuming countries and address arms trafficking, is seen as a crucial, albeit long-term, solution.
However, there’s a counterargument that emphasizes the economic realities. The immense profits generated by the illegal drug trade make it incredibly difficult to eradicate entirely. The idea of legalization is often proposed as a way to undermine the cartels’ profitability and weaken their power, shifting the focus from prohibition to regulation.
This perspective suggests that aggressive enforcement, while seemingly effective in the short term, can paradoxically drive up prices and increase profitability for the remaining criminal organizations, while also incentivizing further corruption. The celebration of a leader’s demise, in this view, might be premature, as the underlying issues and the business model of the cartels remain largely intact, ready to adapt and continue their operations. The cycle of violence and instability, therefore, is likely to persist unless more fundamental societal and economic factors are addressed.