By John Q. Hosedrinker 
While speaking at a counter-program to the State of the Union, actor Robert De Niro expressed profound disappointment, stating he feels “betrayed by my country” and called for Americans to mobilize against President Donald Trump. De Niro urged citizens devoted to the Constitution to “take the streets together” to reclaim the nation. He further characterized Trump as the “enemy of this country” and expressed concern that Trump might not leave office voluntarily, emphasizing the need for collective action in the upcoming midterms.
Read the original article here
The renowned actor Robert De Niro has recently voiced strong condemnation of Donald Trump, expressing a profound sense of betrayal by his own country. These sentiments, echoed by many, reflect a deep disillusionment with the current political landscape and its impact on America’s standing in the world and its internal fabric.
De Niro’s feeling of betrayal stems from a perceived moral and ethical erosion, particularly concerning the rise and influence of figures like Trump. For many, Trump’s presidency and continued political presence represent a stark departure from the values they hold dear, leading to a feeling of shame and national embarrassment. It’s as if the very identity of America, as they understood it, has been tarnished.
This sense of betrayal isn’t limited to those who actively opposed Trump. Even individuals who didn’t vote for him feel a profound sense of disappointment and a shared burden of what they perceive as a national decline. The perception is that America, once a beacon, is now viewed by the rest of the world with disdain, seen as a nation of perceived intolerance and ignorance.
Some argue that this feeling of betrayal is not a new phenomenon, but rather a sentiment that has been brewing since 2016, and that simply changing leadership might not be enough to mend the deep divisions and systemic issues plaguing the nation. There’s a belief that until the United States can honestly confront its own internal corruption and its role in global affairs, true reparation will remain elusive.
The notion of “American Exceptionalism” is also a key point of contention. For many, Trump has fundamentally undermined this concept, representing not a leader who unites and elevates, but one who embodies failure and division. The contrast is drawn with historical figures who achieved greatness through uniting the world, highlighting Trump as the antithesis of such achievements.
The fact that America elected Trump, not once but twice, is seen by many as a deeply scarring event that will have lasting repercussions for generations to come. This sentiment is often accompanied by a grim outlook, with fears that the nation’s decline is ongoing and will continue to worsen as long as certain political trends persist.
There’s also a generational divide in this discussion. Some express frustration with older generations, particularly Baby Boomers, who are seen as having held onto power for too long and contributed to the current state of affairs. This sentiment suggests a feeling that younger generations are left to deal with the consequences of decisions made by those who came before them.
The criticism leveled against Trump is often sharp and unflinching, with some remarks delving into intensely personal and unflattering territory. These attacks, while graphic, reflect the depth of animosity and the feeling of urgency to address what is perceived as a dangerous political trajectory.
Conversely, responses from Trump’s camp often dismiss critics like De Niro as irrelevant or suffering from “Trump Derangement Syndrome.” These counter-arguments tend to frame De Niro as a “washed-up has-been” whose political commentary is unwelcome and ill-informed. This highlights the deeply polarized nature of the political discourse surrounding Trump.
However, many stand firmly behind De Niro, emphasizing that condemning Trump is not a matter of choice but a necessary response to his actions and rhetoric. The argument is made that Trump is doing exactly what he promised, and the true condemnation should be directed at the millions who voted for him and those who stood by and allowed it to happen.
The role of money in politics is also brought up, with references to decisions like Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission and the Glass-Steagall legislation. These points suggest a belief that systemic corruption, fueled by dark money and corporate influence, is a root cause of the nation’s problems and that addressing these issues is crucial for any real change.
While some mock the idea of a celebrity like De Niro weighing in on politics, many others find his perspective valid, especially given his background as a respected figure who has resonated with the public for decades. His perceived authenticity and connection to the “streets” are seen as a stark contrast to Trump’s image.
Ultimately, De Niro’s condemnation and feelings of betrayal resonate with a significant portion of the population who feel that their country has lost its way. This sentiment underscores a deep concern for the future of American democracy and its place in the global community. The ongoing discourse highlights the profound divisions and the urgent desire for a return to what many perceive as core American values.