By John Q. Hosedrinker 
In response to a crippling energy crisis exacerbated by US sanctions and threats of tariffs, the Cuban government has implemented emergency measures. These include a four-day work week for state-owned companies, restrictions on fuel sales, and reduced public transportation services. The aim is to prioritize fuel for essential services and economic activities, thereby promoting food and electricity production and preserving foreign currency generation. These rationing steps are the first of their kind since President Trump’s recent threats against countries supplying fuel to Cuba.
Read the original article here
Cuba is currently grappling with an escalating crisis, implementing urgent measures to safeguard its essential services in the face of a looming threat to its fuel supply, ostensibly stemming from actions by the United States. The situation paints a grim picture for the island nation, where even basic necessities are becoming increasingly precarious. The very notion of Cuba being labeled an “extraordinary threat” by 2026 seems particularly out of step with the immediate reality on the ground, especially when fundamental services like consistent electricity, even in crucial locations like hospitals, are already faltering.
The current predicament appears to be a direct consequence of a significant disruption to Cuba’s oil imports, a critical lifeline for its already strained economy. The removal of subsidies, particularly following the situation in Venezuela, has left Cuba with few alternative sources of crucial resources. This has forced the government into a difficult position, necessitating the prioritization of fuel for essential services such as healthcare and food distribution. The rationing of transportation and power further exacerbates the problem, leading to challenges in distributing food effectively and a heightened risk of spoilage due to limited refrigeration access.
The ramifications of this fuel crisis are far-reaching, leading to a mandated four-day work week for many, a measure designed to conserve dwindling resources. Schools are also seeing shortened days, impacting educational continuity. Public transportation between provinces is being significantly curtailed, effectively placing the entire island in a state of isolation, akin to being on “airplane mode.” The reliance on animal power for tilling fields, a stark throwback to the 19th century, highlights the depth of the challenge Cuba faces in maintaining agricultural productivity without adequate fuel.
The government’s focus on planting large-scale rice crops, described as a high-stakes endeavor, underscores the desperate need for food security. Meanwhile, vital sectors like tourism and cigar factories are being given preferential fuel treatment, a pragmatic approach driven by the island’s desperate need for foreign currency to prop up its economy. The international community, through warnings of a potential “humanitarian collapse,” seems to be largely unresponsive, leaving Cuba to navigate this crisis largely on its own.
The strain on the population is immense, with reports of individuals experiencing severe distress over prolonged blackouts, sometimes stretching to 15 hours. The mental health toll of such constant disruption is considerable, adding another layer of hardship to an already challenging existence. The narrative surrounding Cuba’s current plight is complex, with historical context pointing to decades of attempts to make a communist system function, even during periods of significant external support. The inherent challenges of such an economic model, often requiring reliance on capitalist countries for goods and capital, are starkly evident.
The continued existence of the U.S. embargo, despite calls for its removal and the potential benefits of normalized relations, remains a significant point of contention. The Helms-Burton Act of 1996 outlines specific conditions for lifting the embargo, including democratic reforms, free and fair elections, the legalization of political parties, the release of political prisoners, respect for human rights, and progress on returning or compensating confiscated U.S. property. While some of these conditions might be viewed as beneficial for the Cuban populace, others, particularly regarding property claims, are likely to be deeply contentious within Cuba.
The notion of Cuba posing an “extraordinary threat” to the U.S. is also met with skepticism, particularly given its current internal struggles. However, a counterargument suggests that Cuba’s strategic location, a mere 200 miles from Miami, could be perceived as a threat, especially in the context of potential long-range missile capabilities. The ongoing situation underscores the complex interplay of geopolitical factors, economic policies, and the well-being of ordinary citizens, leaving Cuba in a precarious position as it strives to protect its essential services against overwhelming odds.