By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Canada’s new defence industrial strategy outlines ambitious goals for the next decade, including prioritizing domestic procurement and increasing the serviceability of military equipment. Backed by $6.6 billion, the plan aims to award 70% of federal defence contracts to Canadian firms and boost defence exports by 50%. This strategy emphasizes building capabilities domestically to reduce reliance on foreign suppliers, particularly the United States, and to foster economic growth and job creation within Canada.
Read the original article here
Canada is embarking on a significant shift in its defence strategy, aptly dubbed “Build at Home,” a move aimed at not only bolstering its sovereignty but also at a critical revival of its military readiness. This new direction signals a desire to reclaim a sense of self-reliance, especially in a rapidly evolving global security landscape. The underlying sentiment appears to be that relying solely on external partners, while sometimes necessary, can leave a nation vulnerable and dependent.
The concept of “Build at Home” suggests a strategic pivot towards domestic defence industrial capabilities. This isn’t just about manufacturing existing equipment; it hints at a potential resurgence of innovation and the development of new, cutting-edge technologies tailored to Canada’s specific needs and the realities of modern warfare. There’s a palpable excitement around the possibility of developing advanced capabilities, with some even drawing parallels to historical ambitions like the Avro Arrow project, envisioning a modern equivalent that leverages contemporary technologies.
A key aspect of this strategy seems to be a recognition of how warfare itself has transformed. The increasing prevalence of drones, robotics, and artificial intelligence is undeniable. This evolution implies a departure from traditional military thinking, where large, expensive platforms might be less impactful than a distributed, technologically advanced force. The idea of partnering with countries that are already at the forefront of certain defence technologies, like drone manufacturing with Ukraine, reflects a pragmatic approach to acquiring and developing these crucial capabilities.
This renewed focus on domestic defence production is anticipated to have significant economic repercussions, potentially fueling growth and creating jobs over the coming years. The hope is that this time, the country will nurture and sustain its military industrial complex, avoiding the pitfalls of past cutbacks and ensuring a long-term strategic advantage. The potential for a revitalized defence sector to drive broader economic development and technological advancement is a compelling prospect.
However, realizing this ambitious “Build at Home” strategy presents considerable challenges. Doubts are being raised about Canada’s capacity to undertake such large-scale projects, citing concerns about available manpower, suitable land, and essential infrastructure. Establishing and maintaining advanced manufacturing facilities, particularly those requiring significant power and proximity to skilled labour, could prove difficult in many parts of the country, especially outside major urban centres.
To overcome these hurdles, there’s a strong suggestion that significant investment in housing and infrastructure outside of major cities will be crucial. This would not only support defence manufacturing but also encourage migration to these areas, creating sustainable employment opportunities and building the necessary population base to sustain these operations. This highlights the interconnectedness of defence strategy with broader national development goals.
The conversation also touches upon the broader implications for Canadian sovereignty. The idea of reclaiming control over its defence needs is central to this new strategy. It suggests a move away from a perceived over-reliance on international partners, particularly the United States, and a desire to chart its own course in matters of national security. This can be seen as a reaction to the complexities and potential downsides of deep economic integration without sufficient strategic autonomy.
Furthermore, the discussion emphasizes the need for Canada to adapt to the changing nature of conflict. The rise of autonomous systems and the evolving tactics of modern warfare necessitate a forward-thinking approach. The current military procurement processes, often characterized by delays and cost overruns, are being scrutinized, with efforts underway to streamline and modernize them. Early signs from specific programs suggest a potential for improvement, offering a glimmer of hope for more efficient and effective procurement.
Ultimately, Canada’s “Build at Home” defence strategy appears to be a multifaceted initiative aiming to achieve a delicate balance. It seeks to leverage domestic strengths and foster innovation while acknowledging the need for international collaboration and adapting to the evolving global security environment. The success of this ambitious plan will likely hinge on its ability to address infrastructural limitations, attract and retain skilled talent, and navigate the complexities of modern defence procurement, all while striving to secure its sovereignty and ensure its readiness for future challenges.