By John Q. Hosedrinker 
During a student protest against Immigration and Customs Enforcement in Buda on Monday, a 45-year-old man, identified as Chad Michael Watts of Kyle, was arrested. Watts faces two counts of assault causing bodily injury after an altercation that involved minors and the alleged throwing of objects. Video evidence suggests Watts was the primary aggressor, and while he and a student reported minor injuries, neither required medical attention. The investigation is ongoing, with the district attorney’s office assigning prosecutors to ensure appropriate legal action.
Read the original article here
A recent incident in Buda, Texas, has brought a troubling altercation during a student protest into the spotlight. The situation escalated when a Kyle man, identified as 45-year-old, was arrested following a physical confrontation with minors involved in a peaceful anti-ICE demonstration. The man reportedly stopped his vehicle and exited to engage with the protesting students, an action that seems to have resulted in him facing legal consequences.
The man’s decision to confront and assault young protesters has drawn widespread criticism. Many observers have expressed their disgust, with some video evidence circulating that appears to show him attacking female students. The act of an adult man resorting to physical violence against children, especially in the context of a peaceful protest, has been deemed cowardly and weak by numerous commentators. The fact that he is 45 years old and engaging in such behavior with teenagers has been highlighted as particularly concerning, suggesting a significant immaturity or a desperate need for an outlet for aggression.
Following the altercation, there are reports suggesting the man attempted to alter his appearance, notably by shaving his head, in an apparent effort to avoid recognition. This action has been interpreted by many as a sign of his own awareness of wrongdoing and a pathetic attempt to evade accountability. It’s been noted that despite his efforts, he still bore visible marks, such as a black eye, from the encounter, which ultimately did not aid his attempt at disguise. The narrative painted is one of a man who seemingly peaked long ago, now finding himself in trouble for assaulting peaceful demonstrators.
Interestingly, the man reportedly got “his ass kicked” by the students, with some accounts suggesting he even lost a shoe in the process. This detail has been a source of satisfaction for many who witnessed or heard about the incident, framing it as a form of immediate retribution for his actions. The image of a grown man being overpowered by teenagers, particularly girls, in a physical confrontation he initiated, has been widely shared and commented upon with derision.
There have also been observations regarding the political affiliations implied by his behavior and appearance, with references to “MAGA hats” and comparisons to certain political figures. Some comments have sarcastically suggested that such actions are “just a Tuesday for Republicans,” hinting at a perceived pattern of behavior. The contrast between the man’s aggressive actions and the peaceful nature of the student protest has been a recurring theme, underscoring the perceived injustice of his response.
The aftermath of the incident has seen the man facing legal repercussions, with at least two charges pending. However, many believe the charges should be more severe, given the nature of his actions, particularly the alleged unconsensual touching of minors. The hope expressed by many is that he will face significant consequences for attacking peaceful children, and some have even questioned whether he will receive a pardon if convicted, given the political climate.
Ultimately, the incident serves as a stark reminder of the potential for conflict when adults intervene aggressively in student protests. The reported actions of this man have solidified a negative public perception, with widespread condemnation of his behavior towards minors. The narrative that has emerged paints a picture of a man who acted impulsively and aggressively, only to face the consequences, both physically at the hands of the students and legally through law enforcement. The incident has also highlighted the bravery and resilience of the young protesters who stood their ground against an adult aggressor.