By John Q. Hosedrinker 
A recent Federal Reserve Bank of New York report indicates that American consumers and companies bore the vast majority of the cost of President Donald Trump’s tariffs through late 2025. Contrary to the President’s assertions that foreign countries paid the tariffs, the study found that U.S. entities absorbed nearly 90% of the financial burden. This translated to a significant tax increase for American households, with the tariffs acting as a de facto tax on domestic businesses and individuals rather than foreign entities.
Read the original article here
It’s become increasingly clear, as 2025 unfolds, that the tariffs implemented under the Trump administration were not a burden shouldered by other nations, but rather a cost ultimately borne by Americans themselves. The notion that foreign countries would absorb these tariffs, or that they represented some kind of economic leverage paid by external entities, has proven to be a misleading premise. Instead, the economic reality is far more straightforward: when tariffs are imposed on imported goods, it is the importers, predominantly American businesses, who pay the initial charge.
This initial payment then invariably gets factored into the cost of the goods themselves. Whether it’s the price of electronics, clothing, or even certain food items, the increased expense trickles down directly to the consumer. It’s a fundamental principle of economics, one that many found obvious from the outset, yet it seemed to elude the rationale behind the tariff policy. The argument that these tariffs would force other countries to pay, or somehow incentivize American manufacturing through economic pressure, has not materialized as predicted.
The underlying logic often presented for these tariffs suggested that by making imported goods more expensive, American companies would be compelled to build production facilities within the United States, thereby creating jobs and bolstering domestic industry. The idea was that the added cost of imports would make domestic production more competitive. However, this perspective often overlooked the complexities of modern business and the motivations of major corporations and billionaires.
In many instances, instead of creating widespread employment opportunities, the increased costs have led businesses to absorb some of the tariff burden, hoping for a temporary situation, or to invest in automation and robotics. The expectation that wealth generated by these tariffs would directly translate into jobs for the average American has not been met. Instead, the wealth accumulation has often remained within the hands of a few, while the broader population continues to face higher prices for everyday goods.
The impact of these tariffs has been keenly felt by American consumers, who are now paying more for a wide array of products. This has exacerbated existing affordability crises and added to the financial strain on households. The promise of economic revitalization through tariffs has, for many, resulted in a tangible decrease in purchasing power and a more challenging economic landscape.
Furthermore, the economic repercussions extend beyond just the direct cost of imported goods. Other countries, facing increased costs for American products or seeking to retaliate against trade barriers, have often reduced their consumption of American-made goods and even curtailed travel to the United States. This has had a ripple effect on various sectors of the American economy, from manufacturing to tourism.
The conversation surrounding who truly pays for tariffs has been met with a degree of incredulity by many, who argue that this should have been a self-evident outcome. The basic mechanics of how tariffs function – as a tax on imports that is ultimately passed on to consumers – are often understood as a foundational concept in economic education. The fact that this outcome was predictable for many suggests a disconnect between the policy’s intent and its practical implementation, or perhaps a deliberate disregard for these economic realities.
The notion that this was anything other than a tax on American consumers has been a point of significant debate and frustration. For those who closely follow economic principles, the results have been less surprising and more of a confirmation of what was widely anticipated. The complexity of the global economy and the interconnectedness of trade mean that protectionist measures, while perhaps intended to benefit domestic industries, often have unintended consequences that impact the very people they aim to help.
Ultimately, the narrative that other countries have been footing the bill for American tariffs has been dismantled by the lived experience of American consumers and businesses. The increased costs, the economic adjustments, and the broader market dynamics all point to a clear conclusion: in 2025, and likely for some time to come, Americans have been, and will continue to be, the ones paying for these tariffs. This understanding underscores the importance of economic literacy and the need for policies that align with fundamental economic principles to ensure genuine prosperity.