By John Q. Hosedrinker 
President Zelensky has stated that Ukraine has yet to receive new air defense systems from the United States, although missile deliveries for existing systems are gradually arriving. He emphasized the need for an accelerated supply of these resources and expressed gratitude to European partners, particularly Norway. Zelensky highlighted air defense as a critical priority, discussing the matter during meetings in December 2025 and at the recent Coalition of the Willing meeting in Paris. Furthermore, the Ukrainian delegation noted “concrete results” from the January 6th meeting in Paris, according to Head of the Office of the President of Ukraine Kyrylo Budanov.
Read the original article here
Ukraine has not received new air defense systems from US – Zelensky, and it’s understandably a point of concern. You can feel the disappointment, and it’s easy to see why. When a country is facing constant threats and needs to protect its people, the promise of aid, especially something as critical as air defense, should be followed through. It’s a matter of life and death, and when the supply chain falters, questions immediately arise.
The lack of these systems, as stated by Zelensky, throws a spotlight on the support Ukraine is receiving, or perhaps, *not* receiving. Some might wonder if this is part of some larger arrangement, a deal, as some have hinted at. The implications of such a deal, if true, are far-reaching and raise serious ethical and strategic questions. Who stands to gain, and who is being left vulnerable?
Of course, the UK has stepped up, and that’s a positive development. Getting Raven and Gravehawk systems from the UK is a good thing. However, it still begs the question: What’s the holdup from the US? Is it a delay, a change of priorities, or something more? The lack of these air defense systems from the US is a real problem. The gap needs to be filled.
This situation fuels speculation. There’s talk of trades and deals, of geopolitical chess moves, where the fate of a country is seemingly bartered. It’s easy to feel distrust when promises seem to be broken. What happens when the world’s most powerful nation seems to fall short?
The mention of the potential trade of Ukraine for Venezuela is shocking. It immediately gives the impression that the US is not fulfilling its stated commitments. This raises the question of whether this is the price of some deal or if the US is changing course in its support for Ukraine. Either way, it’s not a great look.
There’s talk of the US “recycling” obsolete inventory through Ukraine. That’s not the case. The US has barely scratched the surface of its obsolete stockpiles. Only a fraction of it is being given to Ukraine. They haven’t really been supplied at all. The situation on the ground needs real and immediate solutions. The delays and what-ifs don’t help, and could even hinder.
The idea that the US may be strategically trading support in exchange for something else, like control over another country, raises serious questions about intentions. It’s the classic political move: make a promise, get the headline, then the delivery never happens, and no one notices.
The focus now shifts to Europe. People are wondering if they can step up, filling the gap. Can they bolster Ukraine’s defenses? The situation shows how the global support for Ukraine’s struggle is vital and why a united front is necessary. If Europe can help, it needs to do so. The clock is ticking.
The debate over the US’s involvement, and whether it’s in the best interest of the nation to stay involved, is important. Some might argue that the US should let others, like Ukraine and Israel, fend for themselves. But it’s really the idea of survival of the fittest. What are the costs?
The sentiment about a new world order is concerning. This is a very serious idea. If it’s true, it would fundamentally change the landscape of global power. That leads to a very concerning place.
Ultimately, the fact that Ukraine has not received new air defense systems from the US, as Zelensky states, is a serious situation. It impacts lives. And the underlying causes for this matter must be fully understood and addressed as quickly as possible.