By John Q. Hosedrinker 
The White House has stated that the deployment of European troops to Greenland will not influence President Trump’s stance on acquiring the territory. Denmark is moving forward with plans for a larger NATO presence on the island, a move supported by several European countries. This action is seen as a message of support, following disagreements between the US and Denmark over Greenland’s future, especially amid Trump’s threats of forceful seizure, citing national security concerns. Greenland and Denmark maintain that the territory is not for sale and has rejected any threats.
Read the original article here
White House shrugs off the presence of European troops in Greenland. It’s almost as if the powers that be are intentionally ignoring the situation, or perhaps they’re simply not taking it seriously. The whole episode smacks of a certain… nonchalance. Maybe they’re hoping it will just blow over. This feels like the kind of tactic that ends up causing more problems than it solves. It’s hard to believe this isn’t causing real friction and unease, especially given the history of transatlantic cooperation. The sense of betrayal being felt by some allies is palpable, and the potential damage to America’s standing on the world stage is hard to overstate. It’s frankly, astonishing.
The fact that European troops are in Greenland, and that the White House seems unfazed, is genuinely concerning. The situation is all the more baffling when you consider the existing agreements and the long-standing military presence the US already has there. The underlying logic, or lack thereof, is difficult to grasp. You’d think the administration would be trying to de-escalate, or at least offer some sort of reassuring statement. Instead, it seems like… nothing. It feels like the administration is betting on being able to “persuade” Greenlanders to support a US takeover, but not taking the European troops seriously. The potential for miscalculation here is huge.
The implications of this kind of stance are huge. It feeds into the narrative that the US is becoming increasingly isolationist, untrustworthy, and unpredictable. It plays into the hands of those who would like to see a weaker, more divided West. And what’s particularly worrying is the potential for this situation to escalate. If, as some have suggested, there’s a risk of military action, the consequences are too horrific to contemplate. It’s a game of brinkmanship that could easily spiral out of control.
If a military invasion of Greenland did happen, the support for it would probably drop fast after people start dying. Americans dying in Greenland would be higher than any kind of recent US military operation. The fact that Trump’s stance seems to be alienating allies and playing into the hands of adversaries is a dangerous combination. It’s hard to shake the feeling that this is all part of a larger, more troubling pattern. It feels like a powder keg waiting for a spark.
The potential damage to NATO, the most successful alliance in recent history, is also a serious concern. Why risk destroying such a crucial partnership? It seems like this whole situation could benefit Putin and no one else. If you were to imagine a scenario in which the situation did turn violent, what would happen in Greenland would not stay in Greenland. The administration doesn’t seem to be considering the full range of potential consequences. The silence is deafening.