By John Q. Hosedrinker 
The White House account shared a digitally altered image of Nekima Levy Armstrong, who was arrested for disrupting a church service, depicting her as if she was crying, without disclosing the manipulation. This follows a pattern of the White House using AI-generated images to portray targets, including those arrested or critical of law enforcement actions, in a negative light. The altered image, part of the case against Levy Armstrong, raises ethical concerns and could potentially prejudice the case. This action also brings to light the administration’s willingness to publish deceptive information pertaining to criminal investigations and the administration’s disregard for truth.
Read the original article here
‘Dark, Bizarre Stuff’: White House Posts Deepfake Image of Arrested ICE Protester Crying: “All of us are on full notice that this White House feels no compunction about concocting obvious lies, concedes nothing when its lies are exposed, and should be presumptively disbelieved in all matters.”
The whole situation feels ripped straight from a dystopian novel, or maybe a poorly written spy thriller. The White House, of all places, is allegedly posting deepfake images – altered, manipulated pictures – to portray an arrested ICE protester as weeping. It’s the kind of move that feels less like governance and more like something you’d expect from a troll farm. The chilling aspect is the seeming lack of any hesitation, any shame. It’s as if the administration is openly flaunting its willingness to fabricate reality.
The core of the issue is the erosion of truth. The phrase “believe nothing you hear, and only half of what you see” is no longer adequate. Now, it feels more like an assumption that everything presented is suspect, and the opposite is likely closer to the truth. This manipulation of information creates a societal foundation where trust is impossible. When the very source of information, a government, is actively creating and spreading lies, how can a society function? The potential consequences are massive, from individual lawsuits to the destabilization of the entire political system.
The White House’s response to criticism, or lack thereof, further underlines the issue. The article cited the response of a White House deputy communications director, who essentially said “The memes will continue.” This flippant disregard, the apparent enjoyment of the outrage, is a key part of the problem. It’s not just about spreading lies; it’s about reveling in the chaos and division it creates. It is a sign of a regime that is actively trying to undermine any sense of shared reality.
It is worth noting that it is not uncommon for the administration in question to punch down. The targets of these attacks are often those who are vulnerable, who lack power, and who cannot easily fight back. In this instance, the person being targeted is an arrested protestor, a woman of color, who had no agency in the creation of the image. The entire incident feels calculated, designed to incite and to appeal to the base.
The normalization of these tactics is perhaps the most frightening aspect. This is the weaponization of artificial intelligence, of technology, to manipulate public perception. The fact that this is coming from the highest office in the land should give pause to everyone. It sets a dangerous precedent, making it acceptable for any entity, be it a political party, a corporation, or a foreign power, to alter and disseminate false information with the aim of creating and shaping the narrative. This is not just a problem for this particular administration; it is a problem that will persist long after they’re gone.
The implications for legal proceedings are also important to consider. Presenting false evidence, even in the court of public opinion, is a form of deception and obstruction. It can undermine the legitimacy of any legal challenges against the administration. This behavior could have serious consequences in any legal battles that might arise. The administration is essentially saying, “We don’t care about the truth; we will create our own reality, and you will have to contend with it.”
This blatant disregard for truth and morality raises serious questions about the nature of the current government. They are not merely lying; they are engaging in what can only be called psychological warfare, creating an environment of mistrust and fear. It is no wonder that the article raises concerns of Constitutional violations and civil unrest at a high level. They seem to be creating an administration *against* the people. It is disturbing when the government openly lies, and then treats those lies as a joke.
The use of AI to generate a fake image of the protester’s distress is especially jarring. It’s not just a matter of spreading misinformation; it’s about trying to manipulate emotions, to weaponize empathy, and to make the target into a symbol of weakness. It is taking a moment of despair and turning it into entertainment, for a specific segment of the population.
This entire situation is deeply troubling, and the only logical conclusion is that the administration will be held to a higher standard of scrutiny. This is not about political games or petty squabbles. It’s about preserving the fundamental principles of a functioning society, where truth matters and where lies have consequences.