The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) finalized a deal with nearly 150 countries to prevent large global companies from shifting profits to low-tax nations, a plan initially developed in 2021. This revised agreement excludes large U.S.-based multinational corporations from the 15% global minimum tax, following negotiations. The deal aims to enhance tax certainty and protect tax bases while stopping companies from utilizing tax havens, such as Bermuda and the Cayman Islands. However, critics, including tax transparency groups, argue that this amended plan could allow major American companies to continue avoiding taxes.

Read the original article here

US-based multinational companies will be exempt from the global tax deal. Well, isn’t that just a kick in the teeth? It seems like some of the biggest corporations in the world, the ones that have been doing just fine, are getting yet another pass. It’s a real head-scratcher, especially considering the whole point of this global tax deal was to make sure these companies paid their fair share where they actually do business. You know, stop them from squirreling away profits in places with low taxes, like Ireland.

In a funny twist of events, this deal could have actually benefited the US more than most other countries. It would have forced US companies to play by US tax rules. But, and here’s the kicker, the US government reportedly torpedoed the whole thing, claiming it was unfair to American businesses. Ironic, isn’t it? Seems like someone’s been bought and paid for by these very same companies.

So, who loses? It appears it’s the ordinary folks, the working class. It really feels like this is another win for the elite, leaving the rest of us wondering how much more we can take. We have to ask the obvious question: Shouldn’t these multinational corporations be paying their taxes here in the US, where they make their profits? Instead, we get tariffs for our everyday goods, while these corporations get a free pass on taxes. What about the working and middle class that are told to vote for this again and again? How many Americans need to be struggling before things change?

It’s like living in a Dickens novel, isn’t it? The powerful corporations get a break, while the rest of us grapple with inequality and economic hardship. We have to keep pushing for fair taxes, and real tax reform for large multinationals. This battle may be lost, but the war isn’t over. We can’t let these companies keep exploiting tax havens to avoid paying their dues to the country that gave them everything.

This feels like class warfare, plain and simple. What happened to the idea that taxes are supposed to fund essential services? It seems like the obsession with hoarding wealth and ignoring the needs of the many is exhausting. It’s disheartening when you see how this impacts healthcare, wealth inequality, and cuts to social programs. It’s frustrating to watch billionaires get richer while the rest of us struggle.

The point of the global tax deal was to prevent these companies from using tax havens. What’s the point of the whole deal if the biggest players are exempt? It seems like this just reinforces the “free market” system that benefits American mega-corporations above all else. How can other governments stand behind this? The US seems to be trying its best to be disliked all over the world.

Some argue that small government is the answer, but maybe governments need to be bigger than the corporations they’re supposed to regulate. And maybe we need to dismantle these giant companies. The US’s actions here could lead to sanctions and worsen its international reputation.

It’s astonishing how some people vote against their own interests. We have to look for alternatives to these exempt companies. The ones that should be paying more taxes aren’t paying at all. But hey, at least we get to “own the libs”. It seems the corporations are facing hard times, and need even more help, so they can keep exploiting the system.

What exactly does a company need to do to be considered “US-based” in this context? It seems like this is about giving them a free pass on income tax. Maybe it’s time to shift the focus to a turnover tax, with no shady deductions. If Facebook has a turnover of a billion dollars, tax them a flat rate, regardless of where they hide their money.

And what would happen if all countries did this? It seems some of these people in charge are willing to take whatever resources they can. We’re getting the short end of the stick. This is not global anymore if there are exceptions, and the playing field is now tilted.