By John Q. Hosedrinker 
The United States’ withdrawal from the World Health Organization (WHO) is now official, a year after the Trump administration initiated the process. Despite the mandatory one-year withdrawal period and a requirement to settle financial obligations, the US immediately severed ties and left $278 million in unpaid dues. The decision to leave stemmed from former President Trump’s criticisms of the WHO’s handling of the COVID-19 pandemic and its relationship with China. Furthermore, the US State Department has stated that the debt will not be paid.
Read the original article here
US officially out of WHO, leaving hundreds of millions of dollars unpaid. This situation, frankly, is just par for the course, isn’t it? It feels like the playbook of a certain individual – a certain someone who’s never been one to settle debts, whether it’s personal or, in this case, on a global stage. We’re talking about a hefty sum of money left outstanding, a commitment to the World Health Organization that was simply… abandoned. It’s almost predictable, this pattern. Trump, or at least his actions, have a history of stiffing creditors, from business deals to, now, international obligations.
This move raises some serious questions about priorities. The US, a major global player, withdrawing from the WHO and leaving a debt in its wake, it creates a vacuum. Some comments bring up the argument that perhaps the money would be better used domestically, to fund a new “authoritarian paramilitary force”. However, others note that the US has always used funding of organizations as a means of controlling other countries. In this case, China outbid them with WHO and so it made sense to leave. But, is it really worth it, especially when considering the potential consequences for global health initiatives?
The ramifications of this decision are many and varied. With the US previously representing a significant chunk of the WHO’s budget (some sources mention 22%), its withdrawal leaves a significant financial hole. It puts the organization in a precarious position, potentially hindering its ability to respond to global health crises. This is especially alarming since there’s an increasing sense of the world being on the brink of another pandemic. Some people would like to donate to WHO in order to make up for the debts.
It also raises the question of whether this was a strategic decision or an act of spite. Some see it as the latter, a reflection of the individual’s personality, rather than a considered policy choice. Others suggest it was a move to shift from “soft power” to “hard power” threats, a strategy which many doubt will succeed. However, this shift in tactics doesn’t sit well with everyone. Many feel threatened by the change in tactics and would prefer a more cooperative approach, especially concerning global health.
There’s also a sense of frustration, even outrage, among some commentators. They see it as a continuation of a pattern of irresponsibility. There is also anger at those who continue to support the individual behind this decision. It’s a reminder of a darker side of the US and the world, and many express disappointment in this behaviour.
And, of course, the financial implications are significant. The WHO has already begun to cut costs in the wake of the withdrawal. This includes freezing recruitment, limiting travel, and making meetings virtual. Some people argue that these cuts could have been done years ago.
The impact extends beyond the immediate financial concerns. It reflects a shift in global leadership, a questioning of international cooperation, and a potential weakening of the US’s standing on the world stage. It’s a move that’s likely to be felt for years to come.
Ultimately, the decision to leave the WHO and leave debts unpaid is a complex issue with far-reaching consequences. It underscores the challenges of global governance in a time of political polarization. It’s a reminder of the need for international cooperation to address global challenges, particularly when it comes to something as vital as global health.