By John Q. Hosedrinker 
On January 4th, President Zelensky enacted sanctions against 95 individuals and 70 entities involved in supporting Russia’s military-industrial complex. These sanctions, targeting both Russian and Chinese citizens, include asset freezes, trade restrictions, and transportation bans, intending to cripple Russia’s weapons production capabilities. The measures also extend to key industrial sectors like chemicals, mining, and energy. Notably, some entities targeted by Ukraine are also facing sanctions from the European Union, which recently expanded its sanctions on Russia’s “shadow fleet” of tankers.
Read the original article here
Ukraine slaps sanctions on companies supplying Russia’s military industry, and the first thought that pops into my head is, wow, it took this long? The fog of war can be a real thing, obscuring even the most obvious connections. It’s hard to fathom that after years of conflict, the realization dawned that some of these companies were still feeding the enemy. You have to wonder how that slipped through the cracks for so long.
Now, some might dismiss these sanctions as insignificant, claiming they won’t make a dent. But consider this: Russia’s military industrial complex operates on incredibly tight margins. This isn’t a new phenomenon. In fact, some analysts argue that a similar situation – the inability to procure vital components – played a significant role in the Soviet Union’s collapse. So, even seemingly small disruptions can have a disproportionate impact, particularly when you’re talking about access to critical technology and supplies.
Every little bit absolutely does count when you’re fighting for your survival. The support for Ukraine is undeniable. And these kinetic sanctions, as someone put it, are hopefully just the beginning. The goal is to choke off the supply chains, making it harder and more expensive for Russia to wage war.
A key point that also came up is the involvement of China, specifically. The sanctions encompass citizens and entities from Russia and China, underscoring the international nature of this conflict and the complexities of enforcing these measures. The article mentions that the sanctions target entities that supply components to the Russian military. This raises the question of whether there will be sanctions of European companies that provide spares.
The sheer scope of the sanctions is substantial. President Zelenskyy signed a decree targeting 95 individuals and 70 legal entities. That’s a lot of targets, and it speaks volumes about the extent of the network that needs to be disrupted. And as someone noted, the revelation of these traitors is a harsh reality of war. The impact of their collaboration has to be devastating.
There are claims that the sanctions are doing more harm than good, that they are somehow self-harm. The argument seems to be that sanctioning the companies supplying Russia is somehow “paving the way for European sanctions” or hindering Ukraine’s access to aid. This is a very interesting perspective. But to counter that, sanctions are the only weapon NATO is actively using to degrade Russian military capacity without entering the war directly.
Furthermore, there is no solid evidence to support the assertion that Russia is “winning” this war. The Ukrainian resistance has proven remarkably resilient, and sanctions, even if they aren’t a silver bullet, are intended to wear down the aggressor. They are about long-term pressure, about making it unsustainable for Russia to continue its war effort.
Ultimately, these sanctions are not about hurting Ukraine. They are about preventing the enemy from getting what they need to continue the war. They are about isolating Russia and denying it the resources it needs to conduct its aggression. It’s a complicated battle, but the aim of these sanctions is clear: to defend Ukraine and protect its future. It’s a long road, but every step matters.