By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Senator Mark Warner criticized the Director of National Intelligence’s presence at a federal raid connected to Donald Trump, raising concerns about its purpose. He proposed two possible explanations, both of which are problematic. Either the Director believed there was a legitimate foreign intelligence connection, violating her obligation to inform intelligence committees, or she was participating in a political stunt. Warner suggested the latter would show a lack of fitness for office and undermine the nonpartisan intelligence community.
Read the original article here
WTF Was Tulsi Gabbard Doing at FBI Raid of Georgia Election Office?
Okay, so let’s get straight to it: What *was* Tulsi Gabbard doing at an FBI raid of a Georgia election office? The short answer? No one seems entirely sure, but the possibilities being thrown around paint a pretty grim picture. The general sentiment swirling around is that her presence, given her past and perceived allegiances, was, at best, highly questionable.
One of the loudest theories is that Gabbard was there representing Russian interests. It’s suggested she was acting as a proxy, perhaps overseeing or even participating in efforts to gather intelligence or manipulate election-related evidence. This suspicion stems from her history of expressing favorable views toward Russia and her previous work in the realm of foreign intelligence. The idea is, in simple terms, that she was there doing Putin’s bidding.
Another concerning possibility is the suggestion that Gabbard was involved in some form of election interference. This could range from attempting to tamper with voting machines to planting or manipulating evidence to cast doubt on the integrity of the election. This theory plays on the idea that they were looking for an excuse to overturn future elections, laying the groundwork for a fascist coup, and that she had no business being there in the first place.
Many commenters seem to view her presence as part of a larger, coordinated effort to undermine American democracy. There’s a strong belief that her actions were intended to either steal elections or lay the groundwork for a future attempt. It all goes back to her perceived involvement with Russia, with the suspicion that she was there to help install software on the voting machines.
Some see it as a publicity stunt, a photo-op designed to bolster her image or create an alternate narrative. This perspective downplays the significance of her actions, suggesting she was simply there to be seen and provide cover for others. But others state she was taking pics to send to daddy Putin. The idea is that she was collecting pictures and videos and providing them for social media posts, to further a political agenda.
There’s also the very blunt assessment that she was committing treason. Plain and simple. This is an extreme view, but it reflects the level of distrust and suspicion surrounding her actions. The sentiment is that she was there to betray the United States.
Another common thread is the idea that Gabbard was there to destroy or seize evidence related to the 2020 election, particularly evidence of Russian meddling. The theory is that, with Trump potentially facing legal troubles, she was working to protect him and others by removing any incriminating documents or digital files.
There is also the thought that she was there to find the missing 11,780 votes. As we recall, the Trump campaign has made several accusations that the election was rigged.
Some posters point out her role is to lay the narrative groundwork for invalidating election results. The idea is she and the others were there to gather information to undermine the election results. Some posters believe she was there to plant fake evidence to support the claims of a rigged election.
Overall, the reaction is pretty consistent: It was not good. The comments reflect a deep-seated distrust of Gabbard and a fear that she was involved in something nefarious. Whether it was election interference, espionage, or simply a photo-op, the general consensus is that her presence at the FBI raid was a serious red flag.