By John Q. Hosedrinker 
President Trump, anticipating Republican losses in the upcoming midterm elections, has suggested an unsettling approach to avoid the anticipated outcome. During an interview, the president hinted that the midterms shouldn’t even occur, citing historical trends and his own supposed accomplishments while dismissing economic concerns. Facing weak approval ratings and potential backlash, Trump’s remarks reveal his resignation to the possibility of losing the House. He has also expressed concern over potential impeachment if the GOP loses control and believes he should better promote his accomplishments.
Read the original article here
Delusional Trump, 79, is, shall we say, floating some rather…unconventional ideas about the upcoming midterms. The core of the matter? The man doesn’t seem to have a lot of faith in the Republican party’s ability to perform well in November. This lack of confidence, stemming from a variety of factors, has led him to make some, frankly, outlandish suggestions.
The crux of his argument, as relayed to Reuters, is that winning the presidency doesn’t automatically translate to success in the midterms. This, of course, isn’t a novel observation, but the way he’s framing it is revealing. He then went on to “boast” about his presidential achievements, concluding with the rather striking idea that “we shouldn’t even have an election.” Yes, you read that correctly. No election. Period.
Let’s unpack this a little. The subtext here is clear. Trump is worried. Deeply worried. The prospect of Republicans failing in November, especially if it leads to potential impeachments or legal challenges, is clearly a major concern. His declaration smacks of someone grasping for any solution, no matter how extreme, to avoid facing political consequences.
The way MAGA operates is, well, predictable. First, they say they’re against something. Then, Trump does that very thing. Finally, they defend it. This is a pattern we’ve seen time and time again. So, when he starts musing about skipping elections, it’s not “just Trump being Trump.” It’s a calculated move. He’s laying the groundwork, testing the waters.
He’s making it clear that he will do anything to avoid being impeached and potentially facing legal trouble. Even if it means undermining the very foundations of American democracy. This isn’t a slip of the tongue; it’s a warning.
The consequences of this kind of thinking are immense. It normalizes the idea of authoritarianism, of circumventing democratic processes for personal gain. It fosters distrust in the electoral system and encourages a “winner-takes-all” mentality where the rules are flexible, depending on the outcome. It’s truly dangerous, and it is a stark indication of the lengths to which he and his supporters will go to maintain power.
He knows that, without power, his allies will face serious problems. Vance, Miller, and all the rest – they’re in this together, and they know the risks. Even the agencies, like ICE, that have become so interwoven with his political agenda are not likely to let it go.
Of course, the media will inevitably pose questions about these ideas. Should he be allowed to cancel elections? Would it be appropriate? These are, however, not the critical questions to ask. The true question is: how can democracy, and our country, be protected from these threats?
This is a man who, time and again, has chosen the unethical, the undemocratic, and the immoral path. His words are not just idle chatter; they are a confession of intent. We need to heed this warning.
The fact is, even the last election was closer than some might like to admit. It was hardly the landslide some people still believe. He knows he is unpopular. He is floundering for a way to avoid the reality that he is unpopular. Which is precisely why these midterms have him and his supporters so terrified. This situation has the potential to become a true circus.
The federal government, including the executive branch, doesn’t possess the power to simply cancel state elections. Yet, he may attempt to convince election boards, and Secretaries of State, to do so. Could he convince Republican states to cancel elections for safe seats? The fact that the House and Senate elections are tied to local and state races adds another layer of complexity.
He may try to invoke the Insurrection Act or employ ICE to his will. Realistically, what actual power does he have to suspend elections, other than simply declaring it? He can’t even control a single city right now. How would he manage to control multiple cities?
And finally, the fact that he’s suggesting all this because he’s worried Republicans will lose is baffling. He claimed to have had the most successful first year in a term ever. How does that make sense? The threat of legal, non-violent consequences will be greatest once the Republicans no longer control either chamber of Congress. That is why they are attempting to accelerate authoritarianism. This is a very real threat to the future of our nation, and should be taken very seriously.