By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Despite concerns about economic damage from Donald Trump’s policies, the stock market has remained surprisingly strong, with the S&P 500 growing significantly in 2025. However, this growth is largely driven by a single sector, AI, raising concerns about a potential bubble. When compared to global competitors, the U.S. market has lagged, and the dollar has weakened. Furthermore, the long-term impact of Trump’s policies, such as the erosion of the rule of law and unpredictable regulations, are detrimental to sustainable economic growth.
Read the original article here
Trump says we have the “hottest” economy. Markets tell a different story. The narrative surrounding the U.S. economy, particularly the claims of its strength, paints a rather distorted picture when contrasted with actual market performance and broader economic indicators. Entering 2025, the U.S. economy was touted as the “envy of the world.” However, the subsequent reality presents a stark contrast, as the year concluded with the U.S. trailing behind its global counterparts in several key areas.
The divergence between the rhetoric and reality is immediately apparent when examining market growth. Non-U.S. markets experienced significantly greater growth compared to their American counterparts during the year. This data, sourced from financial service companies, reveals a widening gap between the perception and the actual performance of the U.S. economy. This disparity challenges the assertion of exceptional economic health.
Beyond market growth, the U.S. has shown a concerning trend in relation to other currencies. The dollar’s value plummeted against other currencies, experiencing its most significant decline since 2017. As financial experts have noted, every major currency appreciated against the U.S. dollar in 2025, a clear indication of weakening economic power.
The idea of the U.S. economy being the “envy of the world” in 2025, according to The Economist’s description at the beginning of the year, seems to have been short-lived. Inflation climbed, prices soared, and the housing market became unstable. Additionally, real wages decreased, and unemployment rose. The stock market seemed to be fluctuating with a focus on quick profit gains rather than sustained growth. This all indicates a pattern of economic inequality.
This economic climate raises the question of who truly benefits from the claimed “hot” economy. Those who are already wealthy, particularly the top 1%, are the ones who are doing well. For the majority of the population, however, the financial situation remains concerning, where access to healthcare, childcare, and higher education lag behind the standards of other developed countries.
Comparing the situation to a burning fire is not an exaggeration. The economic landscape, while perhaps generating extreme wealth for a select few, is not sustainable in the long run. The phrase “hottest economy” feels more like an effort to hide the economic distress. The consequences of such reckless economic policies have been seen in other nations, where economies have collapsed.
The use of the term “hot” appears to be more of a tactic, and it is a tactic used in similar ways in the past. It’s a buzzword with no real definition. This allows it to be used to validate anything. One might say this is a convenient tool, even if the country is experiencing a severe economic downturn.
The pattern of those in power seems to be giving validation on social issues. The administration focuses on creating good feelings. They ignore the negative effects of the economic situation. There is a cycle of economic policies leading to problems and a period of trying to fix the damage.
The stock market’s performance, when compared to the dollar’s value, becomes a central point of confusion. It appears that the economic narrative being presented is inconsistent with the reality of economic challenges. In the end, the economic situation, especially if viewed from the perspective of an ordinary citizen, leaves many questioning the claims of a “hottest” economy and hoping for a return to a more stable financial environment.