By John Q. Hosedrinker 
In response to Donald Trump’s threats of tariffs against NATO allies over Greenland, Keir Starmer has taken a firm stance, conveying his disagreement in calls with various leaders, including Trump himself. Starmer reiterated that applying tariffs on allies for pursuing collective security is wrong. This action could set the UK on a collision course with the US, as Trump has threatened sanctions on several European nations. Starmer is expected to use a Downing Street statement to further emphasize the UK’s opposition to the US tariffs, while also highlighting the importance of maintaining ties with the US.
Read the original article here
Tariffs on NATO allies are wrong, Starmer tells Trump in Greenland crisis call, and that’s the crux of it, isn’t it? It’s a simple statement, yet the implications are anything but. The assumption that Trump views anyone, even allies, with anything resembling respect or cooperation is, let’s face it, naive. He’s not playing the same game. He’s operating on a completely different level, one where everything is about him, his power, and what he can get. The concept of shared values, diplomatic courtesy, or even strategic partnerships? Forget about it.
It’s tempting to think of this as “the Trump crisis,” but history will likely struggle to pinpoint just *which* one. He’s got so many irons in the fire, stirring up trouble everywhere he goes. Some might even go as far as to say he’s orchestrated the biggest “attack” on Europe since the Second World War, a statement that underscores the gravity of the situation. Some might argue that he’s taking orders, like a dog, following instructions. And the question remains: How long until he folds, claiming NATO’s actions were always part of his plan, all while his base cheers blindly?
The problem isn’t that he doesn’t understand right from wrong. He revels in the power play, the chaos, the ability to throw his weight around. Arguing with him is like throwing a rubber ball at a brick wall – you’re not getting anywhere. What’s the solution? The EU, as a unified entity, should ramp up defenses and hit back with retaliatory tariffs. No negotiations, no concessions. Strong opposition is the only language he understands.
Imagine the world leaders who have to deal with this. They’re forced to put on a brave face, feigning understanding, all while he’s probably zoning out, lost in his own world of self-proclaimed genius. It would be a surreal experience to shake his hand and attempt a coherent conversation, knowing his grasp on reality is… limited, at best. It’s hard to imagine sitting in a room with someone and pretending they have a reasonable IQ. This will be studied by historians for centuries.
The hypocrisy is astounding. People support him despite the lies, despite the constant attacks on truth. It’s time for organizations that spread misinformation, like certain media outlets, to be held accountable. The situation highlights the weakening of NATO. The US’s commitment is in question, and the potential consequences are frightening. The US might demand Greenland in return for any help. The words are weak. And let’s not forget the irony of the British Minister offering lessons on how to deal with Trump, a testament to the transactional nature of his interactions.
He’s not a rational actor. He may well be suffering from dementia and is clinging desperately to some legacy that might somehow redeem him. He’s a coward. The only way to deal with someone like this is with unrelenting resistance. He is like a duck, calm on the surface, paddling furiously to maintain order. The UK and the EU need to take decisive action, like dumping US Treasury bonds. Starmer might be polite, but it is clear the approach will be to ignore Trump’s demands.
The intelligence agencies likely know far more than the public. It might be time to unleash what they know: the tariffs, the tweets, the benefits to Putin, and the global outrage. The people involved should be brought before the ICC. The problem is complicated by the Epstein files. But this might be a runaway train.
The fear is real: if Trump attacks a NATO member, or if NATO is actually called upon to defend anything, it’s over. A new administration might try to salvage things, but the damage is done. He’s playing a dangerous game, potentially creating more war in Europe. The US, with Trump at the helm, is no longer a reliable ally, and his base is heavily influenced by propaganda. It’s a sad reality.
He wants riches, not relationships. He doesn’t honor the traditional transactional agreements. He might be like a king, seeking to get money from countries in exchange for nothing. There is a law in the US stating they will invade The Hague if a US politician or service member is arrested. This complicates everything. And don’t forget the extraordinary grift. The question remains: how will NATO respond when tested?