By John Q. Hosedrinker 
The Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB), the closest thing the U.S. had to a publicly-funded media outlet, has been shut down following a massive funding cut. This move, spearheaded by Donald Trump and his allies, effectively eliminates a source of trusted news and educational programming for all Americans. The CPB’s demise will be especially detrimental to the approximately 1,500 local public radio and TV stations that relied heavily on its funding. This is part of a larger effort by the right wing to undermine a functional press and consolidate control over media narratives.
Read the original article here
Trump Successfully Murders U.S. Public Media.
The chilling reality is that the Trump era has significantly wounded, though not completely killed, the American public media landscape. It’s a complex story, but at its heart lies a deliberate campaign to undermine institutions that provided critical information and fostered community dialogue, especially in underserved areas. While the headlines might scream “NPR and PBS are dead,” the truth is more nuanced. They are not actually dead, but they are significantly weakened and scrambling for survival in the face of targeted attacks.
The most visible casualty of Trump’s assault isn’t the nationally recognized PBS and NPR brands. Instead, the damage is concentrated on the smaller, local public media stations, particularly those serving rural communities. These stations depend heavily on funding from the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB), which Congress allocated to disburse federal funding. The Trump administration’s actions, including the CPB’s fear that it could be weaponized and transformed into a propaganda tool, led to an effective defunding. These smaller stations, the lifeblood of many communities, are now on life support, their existence threatened by a loss of financial support.
One of the clever tactics deployed by Trump and his allies involves creating the appearance of a total victory. This induces despair and disengagement, while news organizations, driven by a thirst for clicks, often contribute to the doom-and-gloom narrative. This isn’t just about direct attacks; it’s about shifting the narrative, creating a climate where factual reporting is dismissed as “biased” and where the very concept of objective journalism is undermined. This is where the power of billionaires comes into play, as they actively worked to dismantle the media and other public institutions.
It’s tempting to point fingers at specific parties, but the reality is more complicated. Democrats and Republicans, liberals and conservatives, have all contributed to the weakening of public institutions. Democrats were not able to immediately reinforce checks and balances after Trump 1.0. This is a battle that stretches back decades, with Reagan and Clinton-era policies further dismantling safeguards. The current political climate and court rulings have left public media vulnerable. It’s a sad reality that the opposition has not done enough to protect what they value.
The decline of local public media is not merely a financial loss; it’s a loss of access to information and a threat to democracy. The closure of these stations creates information deserts, especially in areas where alternative news sources are limited. It undermines community bonds and creates a fertile ground for misinformation and propaganda. This is why we shouldn’t “calm down.” This loss represents a critical loss that will need to be addressed.
What’s concerning is the broader implications for the future. The erosion of trust in traditional media, coupled with the rise of social media echo chambers and right-wing “brocasts”, has created a landscape where the truth is increasingly difficult to discern. Gen Z is at risk of being radicalized. This is not about the end of NPR or PBS but about the loss of public trust.
The solution requires a multi-pronged approach. First, there needs to be a restoration of financial support for local public media. This could involve direct government funding or encouraging private donations from wealthy individuals and organizations. It also means reforming and strengthening the safeguards designed to protect public media from political interference. It involves a shift away from corporate-controlled media and a resurgence of independent news. This also means helping Gen Z stay focused on what is important, and how to improve.
Ultimately, protecting public media is about protecting democracy itself. It’s about ensuring that citizens have access to the information they need to make informed decisions and participate meaningfully in the democratic process. It’s a fight that requires vigilance, courage, and a commitment to safeguarding the institutions that underpin a free and open society.