By John Q. Hosedrinker 
President Trump threatened to impose tariffs on countries that do not support U.S. control over Greenland, citing national security as the reason. This came as a bipartisan Congressional delegation was in Copenhagen seeking to ease tensions with Denmark and Greenland. The delegation emphasized the importance of the existing relationship, contrasting with the White House’s stance, and introduced legislation to prevent the U.S. from annexing Greenland without consent. Greenlandic and Inuit leaders have criticized the U.S. administration’s statements, emphasizing their preference for remaining within the Kingdom of Denmark.
Read the original article here
Trump says he may punish countries with tariffs if they don’t back the US controlling Greenland, and it’s difficult not to be taken aback by the sheer audacity of it all. It’s like a twisted game of economic blackmail. He’s essentially saying, “If you don’t support my plan to take control of Greenland, a territory belonging to Denmark, I’m going to make *you* – the American people – pay for it.” It’s a move that seems designed to inflict economic harm on the very citizens he claims to represent.
He seems to be threatening to raise taxes on Americans, again, which, let’s be honest, is a pretty consistent theme. This is not just about tariffs anymore; it’s about control. He’s putting his personal whims and desires ahead of the well-being of the United States and its citizens. He wants Greenland, a landmass that is geographically part of North America, for “national security” reasons, yet the method he chooses to pursue this is counterproductive, to say the least.
This strategy is not new. The use of tariffs as a blunt instrument of foreign policy has become a hallmark of his approach. The question is, does it work? Judging by the reactions of other countries and the economic consequences on the US side, the answer seems to be a resounding no. It’s a gamble that risks alienating allies, destabilizing global trade, and, crucially, hurting American businesses and consumers.
The argument that tariffs are a tax on Americans, not foreign companies, is a crucial point that seems to be lost on the current administration. The increased costs of imported goods are borne by American consumers and businesses, driving up prices and potentially stifling economic growth. The promise of rebate checks is a weak attempt to assuage the damage, one that feels insincere, especially considering the pattern of diverting funds into personal or cronyist channels.
The reaction from other countries should be considered too. It’s almost a case of the US shooting itself in the foot, as other nations may simply seek alternative trade agreements, circumventing the US entirely. This scenario would leave America with less leverage and a diminished role on the world stage. The EU, China, and even Canada are increasingly looking at alternate deals and if America continues its isolationist approach, it could lose its leading role.
The situation in Greenland itself is another area of concern. It is not an unstable or hostile region. It is a functioning democracy, an ally, and taking it over, in any way, would be seen by the world as an act of aggression. What would happen if this “invasion” were to occur? Even the base supporting the current political decisions might not condone such behavior. Such actions, many feel, would warrant impeachment.
It seems to be a case of the president’s personal desires overriding all else, with his base of support willingly enabling his whims. The world is watching and it’s certainly not impressed. It’s a sad state of affairs when international intervention, or at the very least, global sanctions, is seen as a viable option to check the actions of a leader.
In the end, his approach is simplistic and destructive. He only knows how to use the hammer, and everything looks like a nail. He appears to lack the skill or the inclination for negotiation, diplomacy, or the kind of nuanced approach required to build and maintain strong international relations. He won’t even consider working with Greenland and NATO to reach any kind of compromise. His way is the only way, and if you don’t agree, you will be punished, even if that means harming his own country.