The Trump administration’s strategy for Venezuela appears to lack a cohesive plan, potentially relying on bullying or the assumption of a welcoming reception for U.S. troops, even as American oil companies are poised to exploit resources. Despite the existing regime’s defiance, there are indicators that the administration might permit the current Vice President to remain in power if she embraces a capitalist system favorable to U.S. oil interests. This approach, alongside Russia’s silence and former testimonies, implies a potential agreement where the U.S. could be trading off territories like Ukraine and Taiwan for influence in other regions. Furthermore, the 2025 National Security Strategy signals a shift away from traditional alliances, implying a new global order defined by spheres of influence and the pursuit of wealth by major powers.

Read the original article here

The idea that the world is being carved up, with Trump seemingly initiating a new phase, is a chilling one. It’s almost as if we’re living in a grim dystopian novel, with different blocs vying for control. This isn’t just about the actions of one individual; it’s a culmination of trends, greed, and the shifting balance of global power. The sentiment that the world is now effectively run by a few powerful, potentially totalitarian blocs is a deeply concerning thought.

Trump’s actions, particularly concerning Venezuela, appear to have signaled a shift. The narrative of grabbing resources and exerting influence, rather than fostering genuine change or supporting the will of the people, becomes prominent. The issue of Venezuela really hits home here. Instead of focusing on meaningful reform or supporting a legitimate transition, the focus shifts towards resource extraction and consolidating power. This sets a dangerous precedent, seemingly opening the door for others to follow suit.

It’s impossible to ignore that Russia, under Putin, has been engaging in territorial expansion for years. From Chechnya to Ukraine, the pattern is clear: a steady encroachment, a reshaping of borders, and a disregard for international norms. The invasion of Ukraine serves as a stark reminder of the lengths to which Putin is willing to go. It makes it hard to deny that Russia’s actions are a very real form of carving up the world, aiming to incorporate territories into its borders, echoing the strategies of a bygone era.

Now, with Trump’s actions and Putin’s established patterns, the expectation turns to Xi Jinping and China. Considering the potential impact of China taking over Taiwan, an economic disaster that’s sure to affect global economies, the stakes are incredibly high. The potential for social collapse is real, particularly when combined with the job displacement caused by the rise of AI. This is a crucial area to watch, as it could reshape the world order in ways we can’t fully imagine.

The conversation brings up the idea that major global powers may be becoming a threat to world stability, therefore the USA, China, and Russia should be divided into smaller countries. It’s a drastic solution, but it highlights the growing sense of unease and the fear that these large nations are simply too powerful. The possibility of World War III between these three countries seems almost unavoidable.

It’s tempting to see these events as isolated incidents, but they are a part of a wider pattern. It’s a reminder of a long history of aggressive actions by the United States. And this pattern has been normalized, the erosion of these values, and the normalization of this behavior is deeply troubling. When political leaders and powerful corporations use a situation for their own financial benefit and ignore the values of the public and the countries involved, the damage can be irreparable.

The core of the problem here lies in greed, the thirst for power, and a willingness to disregard international law. This is a dangerous combination, and it’s something that we, as a global community, need to confront. The United States has failed, not only in its own country, but globally. The current situation demands attention, and the potential for a catastrophic outcome is very real. We need to be alert to the dangers, recognize the patterns, and advocate for change.