By John Q. Hosedrinker 
A recent global survey conducted across 21 countries, a year after Donald Trump’s return to office, reveals a significant shift in global perceptions. The survey suggests that the US’s “America First” approach is perceived by many as inadvertently boosting China’s influence, with most expecting China’s global power to grow. The study also indicates a decline in the US’s standing as a reliable ally, particularly among European nations, while China is increasingly viewed as a partner or ally by many countries, including South Africa, Russia, and Brazil. Furthermore, the survey found that expectations of Trump himself had fallen in most countries and that Europe’s influence is also shifting, with Russia now viewing it as more of an adversary and Ukrainians looking more to Brussels than Washington for support.
Read the original article here
Trump is making China – not America – great again, global survey suggests. It’s hard to ignore, isn’t it? The sentiment, echoing across a global survey, is that Trump’s actions, whether intentional or not, have significantly bolstered China’s position on the world stage, potentially at the expense of America’s. The world seems to be taking note.
Why would a European ever support the US again? This is a question that’s been thrown around quite a bit, and it points to a significant shift in global perception. The argument is that, at present, China seems less hostile towards Europe than the United States. And when you factor in the potential relocation of major tech companies, like Apple and Nvidia, to establish factories, the shift in alliances becomes even clearer. This move would only further solidify China’s economic power, and that’s not something to scoff at.
Trump’s tariffs, it seems, may have had less impact than initially anticipated. China, adeptly navigating these challenges, simply redirected its exports to other countries, minimizing the damage. In a similar vein, the narrative suggests a growing concern regarding the possibility of conflict. If the US were to engage in war with Europe, China stands to gain considerably, becoming a dominant player in a weakened world.
It is noted that China recently announced a significant trade surplus, a testament to its economic strength, and there are whispers that the US’s actions may have been more successful at aiding China’s rise than China’s own leaders could have ever hoped for. There’s a strong belief that Trump’s policies have effectively accelerated China’s ascent to economic prominence, perhaps even propelling it toward the status of the world’s number one economy. With the shifts in trade and global dynamics, many are saying that European countries might start selling off their US bonds. The U.S. no longer holds the commanding position it once did in global trade.
The assessment also raises questions about the long-term impact of Trump’s presidency, and the concern is that his actions might have created instability and caused irreparable damage to global relationships. There’s a sense that the US’s reputation as a reliable ally has been tarnished, and the inconsistency in policy, switching between alliances and isolationism every few years, makes it difficult to trust. There’s a certain feeling of shock that the current situation is even taking place.
The perception of China is also changing, with many viewing it as a more stable and reliable partner than the US. This represents a significant shift in thinking, with trust in China seemingly outweighing trust in the US. There’s also the suggestion that China’s focus on infrastructure and its commitment to social cohesion are qualities that are admired, especially when contrasted with the perceived issues within the US.
It’s not just Trump, but the very possibility of a Trump presidency that seems to be the cause of concern. The lack of checks and balances in the US system is a major point of discussion, with some suggesting that the system is broken. There’s the sentiment that the next administration, regardless of its political leaning, will have an uphill battle to repair the damage. The view is that concrete action, not just a change in leadership, is required to restore trust. There’s the sense that Trump was intentionally hired to destroy the U.S.
The argument revolves around China’s consistency. Some sources believe that China honors agreements, a stark contrast to the perceived unpredictability of the US. In essence, it appears that the ability to keep to contracts, is seen as crucial. This stability provides a safe place to do business.
The survey findings, indicate a major shift in global perceptions. The narrative suggests that the US, through its actions, has inadvertently handed China the reins of global leadership, leading to a situation where China is perceived as the adult and the US as the child. This is a potential generational fumble, it seems, with the US possibly taking decades to recover from.
There’s a critical discussion of the US’s internal issues, including rising crime rates, homelessness, and drug addiction, and these factors are being contrasted with the opportunities presented by China. The general feeling is that China offers more attractive opportunities.
The argument is also made that the US’s interference in foreign affairs has caused significant damage. The perspective is that China’s internal focus makes it a less dangerous entity on the world stage compared to the United States. The question of hypocrisy is also raised, focusing on the history of American intervention, the funding of controversial groups, and the lack of accountability.
It is believed that the US has lost its soft power, a process that might have taken many decades to establish. The actions of the former president have damaged the world’s perception of America in a manner akin to how Elon Musk’s actions impacted Twitter. The US’s isolationist policies are seen as detrimental, benefiting China’s global standing. There’s a belief that the US’s actions have contributed to making China wealthier.
Ultimately, the consensus appears to be that Trump’s policies have inadvertently accelerated China’s rise to global prominence, potentially at the expense of American influence and credibility. The current assessment is not a positive one for the US, and there’s a sense that the US has voluntarily isolated itself from the global economy. The overarching narrative suggests that the survey results may simply reflect the reality of the evolving global landscape.