By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Former President Donald Trump is facing scrutiny for posting employment data on Truth Social a day before its official release, potentially violating embargo rules. The post, which included figures from the upcoming jobs report, was labeled by some as an attempt to distract from economic issues. While a White House official acknowledged the “inadvertent public disclosure,” they also stated that the focus should remain on Trump’s economic policies. The Bureau of Labor Statistics, which provided advance access to the data under strict confidentiality, is expected to release its next report in February, and the White House is reviewing its data release protocols.
Read the original article here
Donald Trump Accused of Leaking ‘Market-Sensitive Data’ isn’t just a headline; it’s a symptom of a pattern, and frankly, it’s becoming a bit tiresome. The core of the matter is that he’s not just accused, he actually did it. The numbers he put out, were inaccurate, and the actual numbers, according to the report, were even worse. He himself confirmed it, saying he posted it because “they” gave him the information. “When they give me something, I post it.” That’s the quote, and it speaks volumes.
The reaction, well, it’s a mix of disgust and resignation. If you still support him after this, some believe you’re either a sociopath or part of a cult. The sentiment is that he’s been openly manipulating the markets since day one. Laws, in his mind and the minds of his alleged puppeteers, are for “stupid people.” There’s a general sense of disbelief that this is happening and yet, it continues.
The specific data released, allegedly showing a decrease in job growth, is the crux of the issue. The numbers are bad, and the implication is that this leak, whether intentional or not, could have a real impact on markets. Considering his past actions, this fits the pattern, but the gravity of releasing such info has serious implications. The general consensus appears to be that this is not a one-off error, but a continuation of his actions and behaviour.
Looking back, there are claims that he’s done far worse. Some people are saying he released top-secret information during his first term, even sharing the identities of spies. They mention the classified information he took after leaving office. It goes on, with people asking if he also sold any of it. Many believe this behavior is constant, which makes the leak seem inevitable.
The reaction is a mixture of anger and a sort of dark humor. There’s a weariness, a feeling that this is just another day in the Trump era. Some people are openly wishing for his health problems to catch up with him, a testament to the level of frustration. Others are lamenting the fact that in the past, actions like these would warrant an investigation and impeachment. Now, the response feels more like a shrug.
The language used to describe the situation is revealing. Terms like “bizarroworld” and “the head thief of the Trump Crime Family” paint a picture of chaos and blatant disregard for norms. The idea that this is all happening “in plain sight” while the GOP and MAGA supporters seem oblivious or complicit is a common refrain. The comparison to Nazi behavior is, for some, not an exaggeration given the current political climate.
Then there’s the question of motivation. Someone asks about his share of the profits. Was he getting something out of this? It’s a question that everyone seems to be asking. The revelation that a White House official called the leak an “inadvertent” public disclosure is met with scorn, with some questioning how anyone could accidentally post sensitive information to social media. “He leaked it to his chums, then thought ‘this will make me look good so I’ll post it on (un)truth social,” is a common sentiment.
The accusations and the context are that this is a case of insider trading. The feeling is that he’s behaving like a child playing with a loaded gun. There’s a sense that his sons, and others connected to him, are benefiting financially from his actions. Some suggest that even his loyalists are starting to realize that he’s above the rules and that he doesn’t care about consequences.
This leads to a discussion of his business practices. He destroys everything he touches by burning trust with everyone, and when everything fails, it’s “someone else’s fault obviously.” The anticipation is that his disregard for rules will eventually turn on his allies as well. It’s hard to believe that this sort of behavior is allowed to continue.
The use of the word “Accused?” is used to highlight the fact that the behavior is simply part of the norm, with some people joking that he doesn’t usually share such information until *after* he’s done insider trading. The belief that he should be in prison for a variety of crimes is widespread.
The final remarks are a warning. Because of this, he should not be trusted with classified information. He can’t be trusted to keep quiet, and therefore, people shouldn’t brief him on sensitive matters. His sharing of job numbers before the official announcement is another example of his manipulation of information.