By John Q. Hosedrinker 
As the year 2026 began, President Donald Trump hosted his traditional New Year’s Eve celebration at Mar-a-Lago. However, before the party commenced, Trump announced the removal of National Guard troops from several major U.S. cities. This decision followed a significant legal defeat at the Supreme Court, according to a report by NBC’s Gabe Gutierrez.
Read the original article here
Trump Says He’s Removing National Guard Troops From US Cities
So, the situation appears to be this: Trump is claiming he’s removing National Guard troops from U.S. cities. However, the real story seems a bit more complicated than that. It’s looking like these removals are happening because of court orders, not necessarily because he wanted them to leave. The legal battles were apparently putting a damper on his plans for the deployments, with courts repeatedly saying he was overstepping his authority.
This whole thing feels like a classic case of making lemonade when life hands you lemons. He’s trying to spin a legal defeat into a PR victory. Essentially, he’s being told he *has* to remove the troops, and he’s attempting to frame it as if it were his decision all along, citing lower crime rates and a solved problem. He might even hint at a comeback if he feels it’s needed.
The impression I get is that this move is less about a strategic shift and more about damage control. He’s been forced into this position. The courts stepped in and said, “Hold on a second, you can’t just do this.” He’s trying to maintain some semblance of control and make it seem like he’s still in charge, that this was his plan all along, and that everything is under his control.
It’s a familiar tactic, isn’t it? Something happens, it goes wrong, and then he finds a way to take credit for “fixing” the problem, even if he was the one who created it. We’re seeing a masterclass in deflection, where the reality is quite different from the narrative he wants to present. The courts made the decision, and now he’s trying to make it look like his own move, even taking credit for it.
The National Guard’s withdrawal appears to be occurring due to legal challenges. His initial deployment of troops encountered legal hurdles and repeated setbacks in court. It seems clear that the judges were not on his side in this. But what does he do? Well, he says “crime is down, I solved the problem” as if that were his aim all along. The reality is that he was told to dial it back, and now he’s pretending he did it on his own.
This also brings up some interesting questions about the future. Will he try again? Will this be the end of it? Or is this just the first chapter in a longer, more complicated story? The mention of a possible return of troops if crime spikes tells you he’s probably not done with the idea. This isn’t likely the last we’ll hear of the National Guard in U.S. cities, especially with elections on the horizon.
This whole situation also highlights a broader issue: the blurring of lines between politics and the military. It’s not just about troop deployments; it’s about using the military for political gain. It’s about what looks good for PR instead of what is lawful or necessary. The implication is that the motivation behind the deployments was more about optics and political theater than actual needs on the ground.
And, of course, there’s the inevitable spin. He can never admit defeat. Never say he was ruled against. It’s always about how he “solved” something. The whole exercise feels less like statesmanship and more like a carefully crafted performance, and the goal is always to protect his image and appeal to his supporters.
He’s not removing them. They *are being removed* by a court order. These headlines are misleading. The truth is, Trump didn’t have the choice. It wasn’t his decision. The courts made it for him. This is not the action of someone voluntarily backing down; it’s being forced to. And yet, the narrative is being shaped to say otherwise.
What about the troops? They were away from home. What did they achieve? The answer is probably nothing. He’s been told that he had to remove them, so he’s trying to save face. He lost in the Supreme Court, and the military probably said, “Okay, we’re going home,” and this is his attempt to appear to be the one who made that call.
We’re left with the image of a leader who avoids admitting defeat and then tries to take credit for the actions he was forced to take. It’s a power play, and it’s a distraction tactic. He needs to save those resources for something else.