By John Q. Hosedrinker 
President Trump announced a new “framework” deal regarding Greenland and the Arctic region, following a meeting with NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte. While details of the deal remain scarce, it is expected to focus on Arctic security among NATO allies. This announcement also coincided with Trump’s decision to forgo imposing tariffs on eight European countries. Further information on the deal will be released as negotiations progress, which will include Vice President JD Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and Special Envoy Steve Witkoff.
Read the original article here
TACO Trump Folds After Allies Give Him Cold Welcome Abroad
The pattern is becoming painfully clear. Trump, in his quest for… well, whatever he’s seeking in any given moment, often throws around threats, particularly tariffs, and then watches as the stock market reacts. A dip ensues, causing anxiety and potentially economic damage. Then, predictably, he backtracks. The tariffs are “off,” the market recovers, and he can claim a victory, a deal, a triumph of his supposed deal-making prowess. It’s almost too blatant, this cycle of bluster, retreat, and self-congratulation. It begs the question: who are his allies, really? Because the cold shoulder he receives abroad suggests a distinct lack of support, even from countries traditionally friendly to the U.S.
The whole charade is particularly galling because, in the end, it often amounts to nothing. After all the threats, the disruption, the fear-mongering, things frequently revert to the status quo. The current situation with a country like Greenland seems to be a perfect example. Threats and posturing, but ultimately, the same arrangements remain in place. It’s a waste of time and energy, but perhaps even more importantly, it trashes the reputation of the United States on the global stage. We’re left with a damaged image, all for the sake of, well, what exactly?
It’s hard not to see this as a form of market manipulation. He creates chaos, the market reacts, and then, after the dust settles, he emerges claiming to have orchestrated it all. This is exactly what the “Art of the Deal” amounted to – a fiction crafted to benefit him personally. It’s a sad state of affairs when the President’s actions are motivated by self-enrichment.
This pattern of behavior is consistent. He says what benefits him in the moment, says what he wants to do, backtracks when it proves unpopular, and often ends up doing it anyway, a little later down the road. The United States has lost allies. One must wonder if a more decisive action, such as a unilateral one, would have been preferred by him rather than negotiating. When faced with any form of resistance, he folds. Take note! In this case, perhaps he would have preferred that no one even acknowledged that he was a president.
The reaction from some of the alleged allies has been telling. The “Art of the Deal” appears to be simply decrying an unfair policy, proposing a crazy solution such as an invasion, refusing to listen to anyone, and allowing the stock market to crash. Then, when he inevitably gets his way or is told he is wrong, the market rebounds and makes him rich. It’s a playbook that seems to work surprisingly well for him. One could say that it’s all “Taco Tuesday” with Trump, a continuous cycle of threats, backdowns, and manufactured victories.
The man has a remarkable talent for creating uncertainty. His threats, his creating uncertainty, all adds up to a very unpleasant situation for those who would be affected. He’s good at making things worse. Yet, in the end, there is little to show for the disruption. This pattern, this cycle of bluster and retreat, is both predictable and damaging.
The recent events demonstrate this perfectly. The initial threats, the ensuing market volatility, and then, the inevitable backtracking and claims of victory. In this particular case, it appears the only real outcome has been to further erode the standing of the United States on the global stage. This is a common phenomenon with him. He seems to be the one who will lose his own support over his actions.
It’s clear that it isn’t so much about the outcome as it is about the spectacle. He thrives on chaos, on being the center of attention. He craves the reaction, the press coverage, the frenzy. It’s all about the performance. He will find a new situation to cause a stir with and we will go through it again. We are stuck in a cycle of market manipulation. It’s a very weak strategy.
And let’s be honest, the “deal” he’s claiming to have struck is probably very similar to what was already in place, but with a lot of noise surrounding it. It is nothing more than a test, to see how much internal resistance there would be, push the Overton window further by normalizing the idea of attacking an ally. This is not about good governance; it’s about ego.
The key to it all could be found in the debt. High bond rates and increased interest costs will ultimately hurt the stock market. Those who own U.S. Treasuries can sell to lower the price, and raise interest rates. At $36 Trillion and counting, debt is at the core. The entire charade will fall apart if the Supreme Court nullifies tariffs. It seems to be the entire reason for his existence.
So, in the end, what’s left is a deeply concerning pattern of behavior. A pattern of creating chaos, manipulating markets, and eroding the reputation of the United States for personal gain. A pattern that requires a serious response. The President needs to be held accountable for his actions. The current situation cannot be allowed to continue indefinitely.