By John Q. Hosedrinker 
The identity of “Riley,” allegedly trafficked by Jeffrey Epstein, remains unclear, but he claims his adoptive father piloted for Epstein. Evidence suggests that Epstein’s associates were aware of his inappropriate activities. In an interview, Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick recounted a visit to Epstein’s townhouse where he observed a massage table and heard suggestive remarks about massages.
Read the original article here
Trump was in contact with Epstein long after saying he’d cut him off. It’s hard to ignore the revelations surfacing about Donald Trump and his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein, particularly the claims that they maintained contact long after Trump publicly distanced himself from the disgraced financier. This alleged duplicity, if true, paints a picture of someone not being entirely truthful, which, considering past behavior, might not come as a surprise to many. The layers of this situation, with Bannon texting Epstein until the very day of his arrest, just further muddies the waters.
The narrative of Trump severing ties with Epstein appears to be at odds with the evidence. There are suggestions that Trump and Epstein were even together for Thanksgiving in 2017, a date that challenges the timing of the supposed cut-off. This contrast between public statements and what reportedly occurred behind the scenes invites legitimate questions about the depth and nature of their relationship. The public perception of Trump and his supporters’ views on the matter creates an atmosphere of skepticism.
This is not the first time Trump has been accused of misrepresenting his connections. The accusations of his being a back stabby BFF with Epstein suggest a pattern of behavior. Considering everything known, to be shocked by this is an understatement. Many seem to be of the opinion that this is just another example of Trump’s less-than-forthright approach to the truth.
The implications of this alleged deception extend beyond simple dishonesty. The ongoing Epstein saga involves serious allegations of heinous behavior. To find that Trump maintained contact with him after publicly claiming a break raises questions about accountability and justice. The depth of the alleged connection between the two men is not fully known, and that is a concern to many.
The response to these revelations is likely to vary. Some may view it as further proof of Trump’s moral failings. Others might dismiss it as more “fake news” or a politically motivated smear campaign. It highlights a recurring theme: Trump’s willingness to be associated with individuals of questionable repute. The very fact that this is even a topic of discussion demonstrates the ongoing challenges of assessing truth and accountability.
The story of the William Sascha Riley connection being highlighted by Don Lemon, and then the timing of the information drop, is raising eyebrows. If proven accurate, it adds yet another layer to the already complex narrative. The whole situation has become a circus of speculation, accusations, and denial.
The idea that Trump would lie doesn’t feel like news to many. The phrase “Trump lied” is tossed around as if it’s the most normal thing in the world. It’s a sad state of affairs when dishonesty is so expected that it elicits a shrug rather than outrage. There’s a cynicism at play, where some have lost faith in the ability of societal structures to deliver justice.
The fact that the “cut him off” narrative appears to be inconsistent with reality is what stands out. It’s almost as if some people are in denial, don’t care, or, incredibly, support it. The question isn’t whether Trump was involved, but what consequences, if any, will come from it. This case just highlights the challenges of obtaining justice.
The ongoing cycle of accusations and denials underscores the need for thorough investigations and transparent reporting. Whether or not justice will be served, this story shows how the public perception of Trump, and the political landscape in general, will remain. The lack of integrity and trustworthiness will continue to be discussed, and a new question lingers; can society be saved from these sick people?