By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Following the removal of Venezuela’s leader, the Trump administration is considering who will oversee the country’s affairs. Despite Secretary of State Marco Rubio’s expertise, the White House may assign Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller a significant role, potentially overseeing post-Maduro operations. This decision raises questions about the qualifications and strategy for managing a nation of 30 million people. Trump’s statements, including his insistence on U.S. control, contradict Rubio’s efforts to downplay American involvement, leaving the future of Venezuela uncertain.
Read the original article here
Stephen Miller plots wild power move for Stephen Miller, and the sheer audacity of it all is almost breathtaking. The news, straight from The Daily Beast and The Washington Post, paints a picture of a potential power grab so brazen it’s hard to believe. The idea that Stephen Miller, a man known for his hardline stances on immigration and his role in shaping the Trump administration’s policies, could be tasked with overseeing post-Maduro operations in Venezuela is…well, it’s something.
This isn’t just about controlling a foreign country; it’s about the very concept of power. Trump, seemingly on a whim, wants to “run” a nation of 30 million people, and the choice of Miller to potentially do so is, to put it mildly, questionable. The article points out the glaring lack of clarity regarding what this “running” actually entails. How do you govern a foreign country? What qualifications do you need? The answer, apparently, is a willingness to play the role of the dictator’s right hand, or so it appears.
Considering the historical context, the comparison made to Goebbels is striking, and raises legitimate concerns about the direction of the administration’s actions. It’s hard to ignore the implications of placing Miller, a figure known for divisive rhetoric and a penchant for pushing boundaries, in such a crucial position. The situation becomes even more complicated with the discussion of Venezuela’s oil reserves and the intention to seize them. It’s a move that, even by Trumpian standards, is a blatant attempt to seize resources.
The fact that Secretary of State Marco Rubio, the expected face of the operation due to his background as a “Venezuela hawk,” may be too busy to handle the daily grind further highlights the unusual nature of this plan. It raises questions about the administration’s priorities and its willingness to bypass established norms in pursuit of its goals. And, of course, the implications of any official being able to seize control, or even “run” a foreign country, are deeply concerning.
Looking at the practical side of this, it’s hard to imagine how any U.S. official could successfully “run” a country like Venezuela, regardless of their qualifications. Even with boots on the ground, as Trump has suggested he’s willing to do, the complexities of managing a nation with a population of over 30 million are immense. It’s a task that requires diplomatic skill, an understanding of the local culture, and a level of competence that, based on his past actions, is not clear Miller possesses.
The potential for chaos is enormous, and the article raises the question of whether Miller is being set up as a fall guy. As the situation unfolds in Venezuela, any mismanagement or missteps could be blamed on him, offering a convenient way for the administration to distance itself from the fallout. The thought of Miller attempting to govern Venezuela alone is almost absurd, evoking images of a chaotic, ill-fated mission.
This raises serious questions about the entire operation and whether the administration has a genuine plan, or if it’s simply reacting to the situation without a clear strategy. The choice of Miller, given his history and political leanings, is a clear sign that Trump is not concerned with following the standard protocols. There are more questions than answers here. What is Miller’s true role? Does he speak Spanish? Will he deport all the Venezuelans? It remains to be seen how the Venezuelan people will react.
Ultimately, this situation is a complex mix of political power plays, dubious motivations, and potentially disastrous consequences. The idea that Stephen Miller, a man with no apparent expertise in foreign affairs or diplomacy, could be handed the reins of Venezuela is deeply unsettling, reflecting the administration’s willingness to disregard established norms and embrace a more aggressive approach to foreign policy. It’s a move that is as audacious as it is potentially destructive, and the world can only watch with a mixture of curiosity and trepidation as the situation unfolds.