By John Q. Hosedrinker 
President Trump has requested a reduced schedule with fewer but more important meetings to utilize his time “efficiently,” though staff has not yet accommodated this. This request stems from internal concerns regarding Trump’s health and his tendency to doze off during public events and lengthy meetings. White House aides have been working to keep the president awake, even advising him to keep his eyes open during meetings. Further complicating matters, Trump has admitted to nighttime habits that may contribute to daytime fatigue, including late-night texting and difficulty sleeping on Air Force One.
Read the original article here
Sick and Sleepy Trump, 79, Is Begging Staff for Easier Schedule. Seems like this is the talk of the town, isn’t it? The news is out, and it appears the former President is angling for a lighter workload. Now, it’s pretty wild to think about a 79-year-old in the highest office, and the demands that come with it. But when you hear whispers of “fewer, more important meetings,” you can’t help but wonder what that really means. And the fact that he’s repeatedly fallen asleep in public… well, that does raise some questions.
The article mentions that Trump wants to use his time more “efficiently,” rather than it being about his age. Efficiency is a good thing, of course, but the optics aren’t great, especially when you consider the fact that he spent a considerable amount of time golfing during his time in office. You get the feeling that the public is not buying the “efficiency” excuse. It’s almost comical – imagine campaigning on the idea of being the hardest-working president, and then, a few months in, you’re already trying to cut back on the workload.
The reaction, well, it’s all over the place. Some people are pointing out that this is his job, you know, the one he signed up for. If the job’s too much, why not step aside? Others bring up the history of accusations against Trump. There’s also the jab about “low-energy Trump.” The irony is pretty thick there, right? Especially when you consider some of the things he’s said about others.
The idea of the Chief of Staff potentially parading him on the campaign trail early this year, well, that paints a picture, doesn’t it? Like something out of “Weekend at Bernie’s.” You can almost hear the collective eye-roll. Then there are the comments about his health, and how the schedule of a president isn’t exactly designed for someone who’s getting older. It seems like the narrative is solidifying for some, that he’s simply not up to the task.
Of course, the other side of the coin gets brought up, too. The claim that he’s the “hardest-working president ever,” is met with some serious skepticism. The irony of that statement, given the circumstances, is not lost on anyone. And let’s be honest, it’s hard to reconcile that with the image of a president who’s reportedly napping through meetings. It’s almost like a caricature, right? The guy who complained about others sleeping on the job is now requesting nap time.
The general sentiment seems to be a mix of disbelief, sarcasm, and frustration. It’s hard not to chuckle at the thought of a president essentially negotiating nap time with his aides. And that brings up the issue of the system and its perceived weaknesses. Does this sort of thing reflect poorly on the entire political structure? Is this a sign of a larger issue?
Then, the focus shifts to the more serious accusations against Trump. The tone becomes much darker, the language harsher. The calls for him to resign, or to just go away, become much more frequent. There are even the jokes about the Siberian gulag. The anger and the frustration are clearly evident. People are begging for real news of Trump’s condition, hoping to see some sort of accountability. This suggests a real lack of trust, a feeling that something isn’t right.
The conclusion is pretty clear: This isn’t just a matter of workload; it’s a reflection of the challenges of age, health, and leadership. And, it seems, it’s a real test of whether the American people can truly get behind a leader who is visibly struggling. The debate is ongoing, and it’s unlikely to settle anytime soon.