By John Q. Hosedrinker 
A new U.S. company, TikTok USDS Joint Venture LLC, has been established to ensure TikTok’s continued availability in the U.S., with a group of investors backed by former President Trump owning the majority stake. ByteDance, the Chinese-based owner, will retain a 19.9% stake, while Oracle, Silver Lake, and MGX are major investors in the U.S. operation. This deal, brokered by the Trump administration, aims to protect national security through data protection and algorithm security. The company will also house U.S. user data in Oracle’s cloud environment.
Read the original article here
White House and China finalize deal to sell control of U.S. TikTok business to investors backed by Trump administration, and the immediate thought that springs to mind is… well, it’s a bit of a mess, isn’t it? The whole situation reeks of potential problems. On one hand, the stated intent is to protect national security and the privacy of U.S. users, but on the other… it just seems like a blatant transfer of power and influence. It’s hard not to feel a sense of cynicism, especially when considering the individuals involved.
This feels like yet another channel for spreading propaganda. Imagine the possibilities for algorithmic manipulation! With this change, we’re likely looking at a significantly larger operation, which makes the possibility of coordinated influence a harsh reality to face. It’s almost as if the same individuals who decried the potential for Chinese influence are now poised to… well, exert their own. The idea of a social media platform becoming a tool for propaganda and voter manipulation is, frankly, terrifying.
The timing is… convenient, isn’t it? Just ahead of an election. This situation feels like the digital equivalent of a hostile takeover. This development has everyone’s antennae raised, anticipating the MAGA social media blitz.
This move seems to make Cambridge Analytica look like child’s play. We’re talking about a platform with massive reach, capable of shaping public opinion on a grand scale. The scale of the potential impact is simply staggering. It’s not just about political messaging; it’s about controlling the narrative and influencing the very fabric of society.
Let’s not forget the core of the issue: the transfer of control. It’s almost a given that the sale benefits specific individuals and groups. It has the distinct air of a legalized extortion, a situation where the initial concerns about security are being utilized to facilitate a power grab. The idea that this is all above board and in the best interests of the American people seems, at best, a stretch.
It’s tempting to delete the app immediately, and it seems many feel that way. If the platform becomes tainted, perhaps it’s better to disengage entirely. But the problem is wider than just TikTok, too: it is a symptom of a larger problem. The proliferation of these tools is a major concern.
The sheer audacity of it all is almost impressive. The very people who are meant to be safeguarding the public interest seem to be the ones cashing in. The rhetoric about national security and data protection rings hollow.
This whole scenario is a perfect example of what happens when personal gain trumps public good. This also reveals the fundamental truth that no one is truly safe from the impact of propaganda machines.
And then there’s the question of whether the rest of the world will follow suit. Will the UK and the EU adopt similar strategies? This means the potential for a global dystopian hell. We may witness the proliferation of the propaganda to levels we’ve never seen before.
This whole process is a reflection of the larger problems in society. When those in power appear to be above the law, it creates a climate of distrust and cynicism. As a result, many people have already sworn off social media.
This is a stark reminder of the future in America. It’s a sad state of affairs when the government appears to be acting in the interests of a select few instead of serving the public good.
This also seems to be setting the stage for even more of the same. This whole situation is a sobering reminder that the more things change, the more they stay the same.
The hypocrisy is just astounding. The claim that this is all for our protection rings false, especially when you consider the history. The fact that the CEO of TikTok claimed to have no connection to China is just ironic at this point.
The official statements about national security and data protection sound like a well-rehearsed script. They seem to be overlooking the lessons of Cambridge Analytica, the privacy concerns, the manipulation. It’s the kind of thing that makes you want to throw your hands up in despair.
This is the very definition of a grift. It’s a deal where the financial interests of a small group of individuals are being prioritized over the well-being of the American public.