By John Q. Hosedrinker 
A recent CNN poll conducted in January 2026 shows President Trump’s approval rating at 39%, reflecting widespread dissatisfaction across various demographics. The poll revealed that a majority of Americans view his second year in office as a failure, particularly concerning economic conditions. These findings, along with similar results from other polls, indicate a significant decline in public support, especially among independent voters. This trend could pose challenges for the Republican party as the midterm elections approach, as the president’s approval rating is at a “perilous point” among crucial groups.
Read the original article here
Donald Trump approval rating now hovering at 39%, seems to be a recurring headline, sparking a mix of reactions, ranging from weary resignation to outright outrage. The consistent nature of this number, lingering around the same mark for months, has led many to question the significance of the statistic itself. Some feel it’s just another clickbait headline, while others see it as a reflection of a deeper societal problem, suggesting a troubling level of support for policies and actions that many find deeply problematic.
The fact that any percentage of the population still approves of Trump’s actions is, for many, a deeply disturbing reality. The consensus seems to be that a 39% approval rating is far too high, given the perceived damage done and the controversial nature of his policies. This sentiment fuels the frustration with these headlines, as they seem to highlight a stubborn core of support that refuses to waver, regardless of events or criticisms. This begs the question: What would it take to significantly shift this number? What actions or revelations could move the needle?
Moreover, the perception of Trump’s attitude towards public opinion is also a key factor. Many believe that he doesn’t care about his approval ratings, which, when coupled with the view that he is already in a position of power and largely insulated from accountability, further diminishes the importance of these numbers. They suggest that the focus should shift towards finding ways to limit his influence and hold him accountable, rather than getting caught up in the constant tracking of poll numbers.
The nature of the opposition is mentioned, with the focus on the idea that the only legal path to removal is through a compromised vice president and, as a consequence, the feeling that Trump’s position is secure. The idea that Trump is now in a position of strength, consolidating power, shaking down allies, and even having a personal army further underscores the bleak outlook expressed by many. This perception feeds into the sentiment that the situation is “perilous,” not necessarily because of the approval rating itself, but because of the actions and behaviors that are perceived to be taking place regardless of the poll numbers.
The discussion also turns to the broader implications of Trump’s policies. The sentiment that the actions taken during his term, whether it’s regarding immigration enforcement, foreign entanglements, or tariffs, haven’t benefited the average citizen, further compounds the frustration. The questioning of the impact and perceived lack of improvement in the average citizen’s life drives the conclusion that the approval rating should be far lower.
The mention of the Epstein files and the implication that the Trump administration is not transparent is mentioned. This contributes to the broader feeling of distrust and frustration with the current state of affairs. This also suggests that there are far more pressing matters, and that the constant focus on approval ratings distracts from the actions that truly matter. It indicates that the most crucial aspect is to prevent him from regaining office in the first place, or to get rid of him.
The fact that the media continues to run these headlines every few weeks, repeating the same numbers, leads to exhaustion and cynicism. People feel desensitized, and the lack of any significant movement in the approval rating, despite all the controversies and criticisms, serves only to reinforce the perception that the situation is entrenched. This fuels the feeling that the political climate is sick, and that a significant portion of the population is either willfully ignoring or actively supporting the problematic aspects of Trump’s actions. The repeated nature of the news seems to be feeding into the exhaustion.
The article ends on a cynical note, and is reflective of the overall sentiment of the provided data. The phrase, “perilous enough to cancel an election?” reflects the feeling that the stakes are high, and the potential consequences of the current situation are dire. The focus has shifted from the numbers themselves to the actions of the actors involved.