By John Q. Hosedrinker 
The Department of Justice released more Epstein files, including mentions of President Trump and other public figures, with a warning about potentially false claims. Trump announced tariffs on countries supplying oil to Cuba, despite Cuba posing no threat, and simultaneously threatened Canada regarding Alberta’s oil independence movement. Researchers discovered that baby and young juvenile sauropods were the most common food source for the meat-eating dinosaurs at the top of the food chain. Additionally, archaeologists found a significant ancient tomb in Mexico dating back to 600 AD.
Read the original article here
Trump is all over the Epstein files, but the Department of Justice (DOJ) says it’s “fake.” That’s the core of the issue, a tangled web of accusations, denials, and official pronouncements that leaves a lot of us scratching our heads. The very premise seems absurd, the DOJ saying something they released is “fake.” The language used, “double-speak is the tool of liars,” hits home; it’s a common observation that raises immediate skepticism. The allegations of Trump’s involvement with Epstein, including the particularly disturbing claims about auctioning off girls, are hard to ignore.
The core of the issue is that Trump’s supporters continue to deny his ties to Epstein, no matter how much evidence surfaces. The pre-emptive measures taken by his administration, the DOJ, and Republicans in Congress to shield him are also a major point. It raises suspicions about delaying tactics, attempts to suppress information, and diverting attention away from his connections to Epstein. The alleged cover-up orchestrated with Ghislaine Maxwell, including offering her limited immunity, further complicates the situation.
It’s hard to ignore the broader context of accusations against Trump, including sexual abuse, harassment, and even rape by numerous women, and particularly toward younger individuals. This background, including the claims by former Miss *TEEN* USA contestants and the findings in the E Jean Carroll case, provide a framework of sorts, and suggests a pattern. The case involving “Katie Johnson,” alleging she was made a “sex slave” by Trump and Epstein at 13, adds more weight.
The emails, and the “dog that hasn’t barked is Trump” statement, suggest a level of awareness of his involvement. The fact that Epstein knew “how dirty Donald is” also hints at a quid pro quo or blackmail scenario. Trump’s actions and words surrounding the situation, like expressing sympathy for Maxwell and claiming their falling-out was due to Epstein poaching staff, raise suspicion. The email from Epstein suggests he had leverage over Trump.
The fact that Trump labeled the emails a “hoax” and demanded Republicans not authorize further disclosures is another significant point. The fact that Trump publicly distanced himself from Epstein only after his arrest and death is interesting. This goes back to their long friendship and social connections. Trump’s own words, describing Epstein as a “terrific guy” who enjoyed “beautiful women,” further fuel the fire.
The presence of Trump’s name and number in Epstein’s mansion is important. Virginia Giuffre’s claims of being recruited at Mar-a-Lago, and Maria Farmer’s account of the encounters with Trump, create a web of accusations. The flight logs showing Trump on the “Lolita Express” several times, and Michael Wolff’s claims about Trump and Maxwell, reinforce the allegations. The DOJ’s stance of calling these files “fake” is deeply concerning.
The release of these files and the DOJ’s immediate dismissal as “fake” creates a troubling paradox. How can the DOJ release something that is demonstrably false? The implication is that the DOJ has become complicit in shielding Trump. It’s almost as if they are releasing the least credible information to discredit the accusations. They may be playing the long game, planting disproven reports. The “stories” from these files are, “HORRIFIC,” which makes it that much more important to investigate.
The narrative from Trump and his supporters relies on the dismissal of the files as “fake news,” despite a wealth of evidence suggesting Trump and Epstein’s deep connections. The fact that the DOJ is using Trump’s own talking points to defend him is staggering. The fact that the files remain available, even with claims of falsity, raises questions about transparency and accountability. If the files were demonstrably fake, why are they still public? The entire situation underscores a profound lack of faith in government institutions. The fact that the DOJ is taking orders from a convicted felon and rapist is astonishing.