By John Q. Hosedrinker 
On January 25, 2026, Border Patrol agents fatally shot Alex Pretti in Minneapolis, with video evidence contradicting the administration’s initial claims of self-defense. Despite this evidence, the Department of Homeland Security, led by Secretary Kristi Noem, falsely asserted Pretti was a “domestic terrorist” who intended to harm law enforcement. This blatant disregard for facts, however, faced significant pushback from Republican officials and the NRA, prompting a retreat from the White House. The administration demoted Border Patrol Commander Gregory Bovino and sent border czar Tom Homan to Minnesota while also ceasing to defend the killing.
Read the original article here
The Trump administration is admitting it lied about Alex Pretti: it seems like a straightforward headline, yet the reality is far more complex and troubling, according to the discussions. The prevailing sentiment is that the administration, far from admitting any wrongdoing, is engaged in a sophisticated damage control operation.
The core issue revolves around the death of Alex Pretti, a 37-year-old in Minneapolis, who was shot by federal agents. Disturbingly, the available evidence, primarily multiple cellphone videos, paints a grim picture of the incident. In response to the outcry and the visual evidence, the initial response from the administration was characterized as deceptive and misleading. The assertion that they’re “admitting” they lied is, in most viewpoints, an oversimplification. They aren’t explicitly stating, “We lied,” but instead, they’re maneuvering through a multi-stage process of denial, deflection, and hopefully, hoping the public’s outrage fades.
Their first attempt at controlling the narrative likely failed, judging by the public reaction. They seem to be backing off their initial spin, which involved defending the actions of the agents involved. It’s expected that they’ll transition to delaying and obfuscating, possibly shifting the blame or attempting to create a counter-narrative. The strategy appears to involve creating a smokescreen, delaying the truth, hoping the public will get tired of it and move on.
The cynicism surrounding this situation is palpable. Many comments suggest that this is par for the course. Accusations of lying are levied against the administration, pointing out that in the past, similar situations have been swept under the rug with little to no accountability. The general consensus appears to be that nothing has changed; they’re expecting the same outcome as before. Those involved, are not anticipated to face significant consequences, which is frustrating.
The level of distrust is incredibly high. There’s a deep-seated belief that they will continue to lie as much as they believe they can get away with it. The administration’s actions are perceived as a calculated strategy, rather than a genuine attempt to address the death of a US citizen. The focus appears to be on self-preservation, and damage control.
The reaction to the narrative spun by those in power isn’t one of shock, but rather resignation. Many have already made up their minds. They will accept the official version of events, no matter how egregious. It’s a sad reality that the “truth” is being shaped and tailored to fit predetermined beliefs.
Furthermore, there is a strong concern about the broader implications of these events. The focus isn’t just on the Alex Pretti incident; it’s also about the erosion of trust in the government and institutions. It’s about a feeling that those in power are unaccountable, that they can lie with impunity. This is not simply a political issue; it’s a moral and ethical crisis.
In conclusion, while the headline suggests the administration is admitting it lied, the underlying reality is significantly different. The administration appears to be engaged in damage control. They are trying to weather the storm of public outrage, hoping it will fade away. The tragic death of Alex Pretti is not an isolated incident but rather a symptom of a larger problem: a government that operates with a lack of transparency, a disregard for truth, and a culture of impunity.