By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Polling data reveals a significant shift in American sentiment towards the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agency. Support for abolishing ICE has reached its highest level since its inception, with 42% now favoring its elimination. This change is largely attributed to the agency’s enforcement tactics under the Trump administration, which have become increasingly controversial and have led to a negative perception of ICE among the public. Approval ratings for Trump’s handling of immigration are also down, while the majority of Americans disapprove of ICE’s methods, indicating a growing public backlash against the agency.
Read the original article here
More Americans Support Abolishing ICE Than Ever Before, Polling Data Shows. It’s becoming increasingly clear that a significant shift is happening in the public’s perception of the Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency. Recent polling data, as highlighted by Civiqs, reveals that a substantial 42% of Americans now support the idea of getting rid of ICE. While 50% still oppose it, the margin is narrowing, indicating growing support for abolishment.
It’s easy to see why, given some of the disturbing incidents that have come to light. The recent shooting in Minneapolis, for example, shines a light on some of the questionable tactics employed by ICE officers, and some of the footage raises serious questions about the use of force. Some legal experts are suggesting it could be seen as a violation of the 4th amendment, the protection against unreasonable search and seizure. The very actions of ICE agents can be seen as problematic and deserving of a thorough examination.
Calls for reform have emerged, including suggestions like banning officers from shooting at moving vehicles and requiring ICE training that clearly states ICE agents are to get out of the way of moving vehicles. However, a more radical solution, and one that’s gaining traction, is the complete abolishment of ICE. This sentiment is reaching an all-time high, spurred by a combination of concerns about its tactics and the increasing awareness of its scope.
It’s worth noting that ICE’s popularity was already waning even before some of these recent events. Many Americans, even prior to these incidents, felt the agency was doing too much to deport immigrants. This growing sentiment suggests a broader dissatisfaction with the agency’s role and methods.
The voices of constituents can have a real impact, particularly when they’re united. Reaching out to elected representatives, sharing opinions, and demanding change can make a difference. Some would argue that simply abolishing ICE isn’t enough; dismantling the entire Department of Homeland Security and reversing legislation like the Patriot Act are seen as crucial steps to restore some of the liberties lost in the post-9/11 era.
It’s not just about one agency; it’s about the scope and power of the executive branch. ICE, created in 2003, is a relatively recent addition to the American landscape. The country functioned for over two centuries without it, leading many to question its necessity and efficacy. The alternative is simple: strengthening existing law enforcement agencies, providing them with the necessary resources and training to do their jobs effectively, rather than relying on a force some see as a “gestapo.”
Critics argue that ICE has become an overreach of the executive branch, and is often employed in extra-constitutional actions. The idea of transferring ICE’s duties to existing law enforcement agencies until a truly law-abiding organization can be formed is gaining traction. This is about accountability, transparency, and a return to the principles of a just and fair society. The concern is that they are being used by bad actors.
There are varying perspectives on how best to address the issues. Some propose dismantling the agency strategically, perhaps by “refining” its function, the way some other government departments have been broken down, and others suggest a complete overhaul, with a focus on prosecuting those responsible for wrongdoing.
The public support for abolishing ICE is growing, and it’s a reflection of deeper concerns about government overreach, and a desire to return to a more just and equitable society. The push for reform will be a long and complex process, but it’s clear that the conversation is evolving.