Stephen Miller Mocked for Claiming Star Trek Needs Saving From “Wokeness”

The HuffPost is committed to reporting on the escalating immigration crackdown under the Trump administration, emphasizing the importance of truth in these critical times. Reporters are actively investigating and holding authorities accountable for their actions and the emerging patterns. This journalism is crucial for documenting the events and understanding their significance. Readers are encouraged to support this work that aims to inform the public about the complex and often dangerous realities of the situation.

Read the original article here

Stephen Miller Mocked For Begging William Shatner To Save ‘Star Trek’ From Wokeness

Stephen Miller’s plea to William Shatner to “save Star Trek” has been met with a resounding wave of mockery and bewilderment. The core issue, as many observers have pointed out, is the fundamental misunderstanding of what *Star Trek* has always been. The irony isn’t lost on anyone: Miller, a figurehead of a political movement often perceived as resistant to social progress, is apparently aghast at the series’ perceived “wokeness,” when, in fact, *Star Trek* practically invented the concept.

The central point here is that *Star Trek*, from its very inception in the 1960s, was a bold exploration of progressive themes. The original series, a product of the Civil Rights era, featured a diverse cast, including an interracial kiss, a Japanese helmsman post-World War II, and a Russian crewmember during the Cold War. These elements weren’t just background dressing; they were deliberate choices to challenge prevailing societal norms. The show frequently tackled issues like racism, classism, and prejudice, making its message clear to anyone paying attention. The show’s creator, Gene Roddenberry, fought hard to keep this vision alive, against the network’s desire to tone it down. This vision was, at its core, one of hope for the future, where humanity overcomes its differences.

The criticism directed at Miller points out that he seems to have completely missed the point of the series. The show’s very premise – a multi-racial, multi-species crew working together in a post-scarcity utopia – is the antithesis of the ideology Miller often represents. The Federation, the governing body of *Star Trek*, champions values like mutual respect, cooperation, and collective progress. The series has always been ahead of its time. *Star Trek* was, in many ways, the definition of “wokeness” long before the term became a political lightning rod.

Furthermore, it is pointed out that *Star Trek* continued its commitment to progressive themes in subsequent series, like *The Next Generation* (TNG). This series included LGBTQ+ awareness, same-sex kisses, and advocacy for those with disabilities, among many other groundbreaking elements. This dedication continued across all of its series. This isn’t just a modern phenomenon; it’s woven into the very fabric of *Star Trek*’s DNA.

There’s also a significant amount of humor in the reaction to Miller’s comments. Many commentators imagine a MAGA-themed version of *Star Trek* and it’s about as absurd as you can get, envisioning a dystopian future that’s the complete opposite of the show’s ideals. This highlights the fundamental disconnect between the show’s values and Miller’s political stance.

The mocking also extends to Miller’s alleged lack of pop culture knowledge, and that he may not even have watched the series. His request to Shatner, a Canadian, is often highlighted as another point of comedic irony. Miller asking Shatner to “save” something that’s always been about inclusion and diversity is a classic example of not understanding what one is complaining about.

The reaction to Miller’s remarks reinforces the idea that some people use “woke” as a catch-all term for things they simply dislike or don’t understand, and that *Star Trek*, with its consistent message of progress and inclusivity, simply doesn’t fit within their worldview.