By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Following President Trump’s claim of securing a temporary ceasefire from Russia, the Kremlin clarified that the request was limited to refraining from striking Kyiv until February 1st to facilitate negotiations. Despite this, Russian attacks continued, with strikes reported on energy infrastructure and residential areas, resulting in casualties. Ukrainian President Zelensky confirmed there was no direct agreement but acknowledged the potential opportunity, also noting that Ukraine would reciprocate the non-aggression if Russia refrained from attacking. Discussions on a potential ceasefire, including a mutual halt on attacks on energy infrastructure, had reportedly taken place during a trilateral meeting in Abu Dhabi, ahead of additional talks on February 1st.
Read the original article here
Confusion reigns as Russia says it was only asked to stop attacking Kyiv until Sunday. This whole situation feels less like a genuine attempt at peace and more like a carefully orchestrated performance, doesn’t it? The core of the matter, as I understand it, stems from Russia’s assertion that any temporary cessation of attacks on Kyiv was only meant to last until Sunday. It’s a statement that immediately throws a wrench into any hope of a sustained ceasefire, leaving everyone, from political analysts to the average person following the news, scratching their heads. The implication is clear: the attacks could resume very soon, undermining any sense of progress or relief.
This “pause,” as they call it, seems designed to feed into certain narratives, particularly the ones that Trump seems to enjoy perpetuating. Let’s be honest, the whole thing feels like a setup to fuel Trump’s claims of having some secret leverage with the Kremlin, a way for him to take credit for something he had absolutely nothing to do with. You just know that if things don’t go as planned, the blame will be quickly shifted to Ukraine. It’s a familiar tactic, and frankly, it’s getting old.
The timing of this so-called pause is also quite interesting. Apparently, some people have speculated that it aligns with the anticipated blast of cold weather coming to Kyiv, which makes you wonder if it is less a matter of genuine ceasefire and more about waiting for a strategic advantage. It just so happens that they might not have attacked for a few days anyway due to their own strategic reasons. And with attacks still ongoing despite the limited time frame, it reinforces the impression of a cynical game.
What really throws a wrench in this is how Trump seemingly takes credit, time and time again. He’s already “stopped the war” numerous times, according to his own narrative. It feels like every week he’s taking a bow for something he has little to no control over. The entire situation feels performative, with ceremonies scheduled every other day. To cut through the fog, wouldn’t it be easier if Americans and Russians simply published the full transcripts of the calls between Trump and Putin?
Frankly, the whole charade feels ludicrous. It seems like the futures of billions are being influenced by a few individuals, who are seemingly ill-equipped to handle the gravity of their decisions. The news that Russia still has missiles to spare does not exactly improve the situation, either.
It’s pretty clear where the control truly lies here. The situation has highlighted the dynamics at play: Trump’s alleged reliance on Putin. It’s an uncomfortable picture, and one that is not at all new.
Given the consistent pattern of events, there is little confusion here. If Russia says the sky is blue, the reaction should be to verify from a safe distance.
I think the important thing is to acknowledge what is happening. The bombings will continue until the two parties involved come to an agreement, and the Nobel Peace Prize nominations keep coming. Trump, it seems, will keep taking credit.
It’s interesting how Putin and Trump both share the quality of not being trustworthy. They keep doing the same thing. They make statements that are easily refuted by the facts on the ground. It is like they have a toxic relationship.
The phrasing “until Sunday” is a very telling. It suggests Russia’s negotiating strategy, using ambiguity to their advantage. It allows them to maintain a position of plausible deniability. If the attacks halt, they can claim they met the conditions. If they restart, they can portray any Ukrainian reaction as escalation. It’s a textbook Kremlin tactic.
The underlying reality may be that Ukraine ran out of supplies and Russia needed time to resupply, but Trump still will keep claiming he is the great negotiator.
I think this whole scenario underlines one simple truth: don’t be surprised. Everyone saw this coming.